It turns out that after all these years there is one massacre that Beijing is willing to talk about and commemorate, just not the one that happened in the heart of the Chinese capital almost 28 years ago.
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office spokesman An Fengshan (安峰山) on Wednesday told a news conference in Beijing that the Chinese government would hold a series of events to commemorate the 70th anniversary of the 228 Massacre.
He then tried to claim that the 1947 protests in Taiwan against the then-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime were part of a greater struggle by Chinese for liberation from the KMT and blasted “pro-independence forces” in Taiwan for “hijacking” the incident for nefarious purposes.
With a nod toward tomorrow’s Academy Awards, An deserves an Oscar for best supporting actor for his delivery of the lines: “They have distorted historical facts, instigated contradictions based on provincial origins, tearing at Taiwan’s ethnic groups, creating antagonism in society. I think the motives behind this are really despicable.”
Once again, An’s trite script not only proved that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is impervious to irony, but that the CCP and the KMT are fraternal twins, as his remarks sounded so similar to the tripe the KMT trots out about the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and other pan-green camp members “stirring up ethnic enmity” every time an effort is made to hold the KMT and former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) to account for the atrocities of the massacre, the imposition of martial law and the decades-long White Terror era.
Although if there is one thing that both the CCP and the KMT know a lot about, it is distorting historical facts, what is most interesting about An’s comments was the timing.
This is not the first time that China has tried to capitalize on the massacre, but previous efforts were largely aimed at Chinese academics, not the public in China and certainly not the average Taiwanese.
It would appear that with the KMT now consigned to a minor opposition party, and Beijing’s obstinate refusal to deal with President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration or the DPP, China is hoping to curry favor directly with Taiwanese, just as it has been doing with its call for Chinese tourists to visit only pan-blue-camp-governed counties and cities.
It will be telling to see exactly what China does to commemorate the massacre, since any mention of people fighting for their basic rights against a dictatorship would not only raise the specter of the 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre, but draw uncomfortable parallels to the efforts by democracy and human rights advocates to hold the CCP accountable for its actions and press for change in China.
However, An’s news conference also serves as a reminder of the need for Tsai’s government to finally provide Taiwanese and the world with a full and accurate accounting of the 228 Massacre, and to hold those responsible to account.
Tsai on Thursday promised to do just that.
As she said, since the lifting of martial law, previous administrations have admitted to mistakes, apologized and erected monuments, but the focus has been on identifying the victims and compensating their families.
However, more needs to be done as part of a move toward reconciliation so that the truth about this key point in Taiwan’s history cannot be hijacked by China or further whitewashed by KMT apologists — such as former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who, the year before he became president, described the 228 Massacre as simply a “crackdown” carried out by the KMT in response to “missteps by local officials.”
The 228 Massacre is part of what has made Taiwan the democratic nation it is today.
As Tsai said, Taiwanese “should not forget history, or our trauma.”
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With
Astride an ascended economy and military, with global influence nearing biblical proportions, Xi Jinping (習近平) — general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), chairman of the Central Military Commission and president of the People’s Republic of China — is faithfully heralded, in deeds and imagery, as a benevolent lord, determined to “build a community of common destiny for all mankind.” Rather than leading humanity to this Shangri-La through inspirational virtue a la Mahatma Gandhi or Abraham Lincoln, the CCP prefers a micromanagement doctrine of socialism with Chinese characteristics as the guiding light. A doctrine of Marxist orthodoxy transplanted under a canvas
On Sept. 8, at the high-profile Ketagalan security forum, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) urged countries to deal with the China challenge. She said: “It is time for like-minded countries, and democratic friends in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond, to discuss a framework to generate sustained and concerted efforts to maintain a strategic order that deters unilateral aggressive actions.” The “Taiwan model” to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic provides an alternative to China’s authoritarian way of handling it. Taiwan’s response to the health crisis has made it evident that countries across the world have much to learn from Taiwan’s best practices and if