Former Hong Kong chief executive Donald Tsang (曾蔭權) was found guilty of bribery and misconduct in public office last week. On several occasions, he was reported to have exploited the privileges of his position for personal gain. He is the first — and hopefully the last — Hong Kong chief executive to be convicted in a criminal court.
Since 1997, the post-colonial arrangement of “one country, two systems” has degenerated into that of “one Hong Kong, two realities.” Privileged members of elites have become inviolable and immune from any legal processes, whereas ordinary people are subject to much scrutiny.
Numerous incidents of misconduct, corruption and abuse of public authority have normalized the dominant power structure in an autocratic system, thereby advancing the interests of the powerful at the expense of a disfranchised majority.
This case not only reveals the erosive effects of nepotism and cronyism in the post-colonial era, but also adds to the long list of scandals that have undermined Hong Kongers’ confidence in the legitimacy and integrity of the territory’s system of governance.
Yet, the surprising outcome of Tsang’s trial proved otherwise. The territory’s judicial independence is probably the only core institution that has not been eroded. Hong Kong’s judges, who are versed in common law traditions, continue to uphold the principles of fair play and substantial justice.
While Hong Kongers are contemplating the ramifications of their disgraced former leader’s conviction, the electoral race to become the territory’s next chief executive has begun. Several candidates are competing for the position, with former chief secretary for administration Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥) and former secretary of finance John Tsang (曾俊華) emerging as frontrunners.
How Tsang’s trial will affect the development of the election remains to be seen, but whoever wins next month’s poll will have to confront three structural problems in local politics.
First, the chief executive race is more like a selection process among pro-Beijing community representatives, business tycoons and urban professionals than a democratic election. Adhering to a longstanding policy of denying Hong Kong full democracy, China preempted electoral reform and its handpicked political agents have no legitimacy in the eyes of the public.
The 1,200-member Chief Executive Election Committee is scheduled to meet and decide on the next political leader. The pro-democracy camp occupy about 300 seats in this body, but pro-Beijing groups and some prominent business leaders have a dominant presence. Given this imbalance, it is hard for people to initiate a genuine debate about direct democracy in the electoral competition.
Worse still, there are restrictions on who can be nominated to sit on the committee. Pledging allegiance to the Chinese Communist Party is a precondition for becoming the territory’s chief executive. None of the candidates is willing to acknowledge and support the rise of localism as a means to defend Hong Kong’s core values.
Second, many Hong Kongers are struggling to come to grips with the gradual disappearance of the “one country, two systems” constitutional framework.
During the 1980s, Beijing wanted to ease people’s concerns about the territory’s future under communism. It introduced the Basic Law, which guaranteed that socialism would not be implemented and the existing capitalist system and way of life would remain unchanged for 50 years.
However, witnessing Beijing’s constant intervention in local affairs, Hong Kongers are deeply concerned over the 2047 deadline, when the territory is mandated to be part of the People’s Republic of China.
Third, the neoliberal discourse of laissez-faire prosperity has lost its appeal for Hong Kongers, who see no hope in a futureless society. Tycoons and middle-class professionals still profit from cross-border trade with China and they choose to ignore corruption and nepotism in all levels of Chinese bureaucracy.
The ruling elite have often employed the logic of economic transaction to engage with people. Their legitimacy depends on the satisfactory outcome of public policies, but their arrogance and insensitivity has reinforced many discriminatory measures against poor people.
In the light of Chinese economic slowdown, the Hong Kong government has been incapable of resolving the rising grievances and improving the territory’s wellbeing.
Perhaps chief executive candidates should pay attention to Donald Tsang’s downfall. His trial touches on the complicated relationship between rule of law and the exercise of power. The next chief executive has to manage a government devoid of legitimacy, so it is important to seek a consensus on issues of democracy and cross-border relations with China.
Otherwise, the new leadership will find it hard to restore Hong Kong’s fragile institutions and win the hearts and minds of Hong Kongers.
Joseph Tse-hei Lee is professor of history at Pace University in New York.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past
President-elect William Lai (賴清德) is to accede to the presidency this month at a time when the international order is in its greatest flux in three decades. Lai must navigate the ship of state through the choppy waters of an assertive China that is refusing to play by the rules, challenging the territorial claims of multiple nations and increasing its pressure on Taiwan. It is widely held in democratic capitals that Taiwan is important to the maintenance and survival of the liberal international order. Taiwan is strategically located, hemming China’s People’s Liberation Army inside the first island chain, preventing it from