Former director of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences’ Institute of Taiwan Studies Zhou Zhihuai (周志懷) was recently replaced by Yang Mingjie (楊明杰), who specializes in arms control and security, and US-China ties.
Taiwan experts are claiming that Chinese strategic thinking is about to change: This is premature. More attention should be given to a speech made by Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Yu Zhengsheng (俞正聲) to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) meeting on Taiwan affairs on Jan. 20.
“Over the past year, the CCP Central Committee with — Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at its core — has accurately judged the situation and made scientific decisionmaking arrangements to firmly grasp the general direction of the development of cross-strait relations,” Yu said.
“Scientific decisionmaking arrangements” refers to the so-called “concept of scientific development” Xi has promoted. Since 2015, Xi has been making ever more frequent demands on government departments to adopt scientific method and study policy planning and decisionmaking arrangements. This is particularly the case for officials working on Taiwan policy.
Between now and the CCP’s 19th National Congress in fall, it is likely that there will be more signs of China’s “scientific decisionmaking.”
This year “cross-strait relations and the situation in the Taiwan Strait will become more complicated and difficult. We must continue to adhere to the ‘1992 consensus’ based on the ‘one China’ principle and resolutely oppose and suppress any form of Taiwanese independence separatist activities,” Yu said.
Xi enters his second term of office of this year. Chinese leaders will not allow any changes to Taiwan Strait relations to disrupt Xi’s personnel arrangements or policy priorities before the congress.
A key task for Beijing will be to systematically disrupt any moves toward Taiwanese independence and to try to force the “one China” principle. This will also be important in allowing Beijing to prevent any unexpected developments in Taiwan-US relations.
Yu called for “all departments in all localities to unite all political parties, groups and organizations in Taiwan that recognize that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to ‘one China,’ and to continue to promote cross-strait exchanges and cooperation in various fields.”
He also call for measures to facilitate Taiwanese studying, working and living in China to protect their interests in accordance with the law. China hopes to influence Taiwanese attitudes toward China, to include Taiwanese as Chinese citizens, so they will recognize the “one China” principle.
China’s Taiwan policy unit should build upon the CCP’s system of “clean government,” adhere to high standards of self-discipline and build a team of high-quality “cadres,” Yu said.
This could be interpreted as encouragement, or it might allude to a goal to replace officials working on Taiwan policy before the congress.
Yang’s appointment have given some clues. It was done to imply that incompetent staff will be replaced or transferred, while those involved in Taiwan policy must redouble their efforts to tackle Taiwanese independence.
The CCP’s thinking on Taiwan policy follows the rhythm of its systems and procedures, while also being dictated by effectiveness. While Yang’s promotion reflects the uncertainty of the new China-US relationship, it was just fine-tuning within the normal processes of government.
Li Hua-chiu is a national defense strategies researcher at the Society for Strategic Studies in Taiwan.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers