Ahead of the Lunar New Year holiday, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) reported that Taiwan’s economy grew 2.58 percent year-on-year in the final quarter of last year, indicating that the economy had extended its growth trend for the third consecutive quarter.
The result had not only confirmed a widely expected year-end acceleration following an increase of 2.03 percent in the third quarter, but also helped lift the nation’s GDP growth to 1.4 percent last year, the fastest expansion in four years.
Unsurprisingly, the strong GDP growth last quarter was the result of continued improvements in the nation’s economic activities in recent months, driven by manufacturing amid a strong external demand for electronics.
The major growth engine was gross capital formation which, expanded by 8.24 percent from a year earlier, more than doubling the 3.11 percent increase registered in the previous quarter.
Meanwhile, net external demand — or exports minus imports — contributed 0.37 percentage points to the headline GDP growth, reversing from a deduction of 0.4 percentage points a quarter earlier.
Overall, the economy is likely to remain buoyant in the near term, considering that leading indicators such as export orders and the manufacturing purchasing managers’ index continue to suggest global trade increases.
The DGBAS has maintained its GDP growth projection at 1.87 percent for this year and the National Development Council has set its economic growth target between 2 percent and 2.5 percent.
Nonetheless, growth headwinds remain.
First, private consumption — which rose a lackluster 1.3 percent last quarter compared with 2.5 percent in the prior quarter — is likely to stay subdued as long as wage growth lags behind rising inflation.
Growth of regular earnings for workers increased only 1.3 percent in the first 11 months of last year, while the consumer price index rose 1.4 percent. In addition, new labor laws could add more pressure to inflation this year, while some companies might seek alternative means to lower costs and delay wage increases.
Second, whether exports can sustain the recovery is linked to the new US government. The risks from US protectionism and any political or economic developments that threaten European stability would add extra stress to Taiwan’s trade-reliant economy.
In addition, as China accounted for 40 percent and the US 12 percent of Taiwan’s US$280.4 billion (US$9 billion) in exports last year, avoiding the risk of spillover effects from a trade dispute between the two countries is an important task for policymakers.
Local businesses also need to stay vigilant, because investments in industries like computing, electronics and textiles in China would likely be targeted in the event of a trade war.
Credit Suisse Group AG warned that a potential border tax by the US government could cause a decrease of between 4 percent and 5 percent in Taiwanese exports, reducing the rate of GDP growth by up to 0.8 percentage points.
Third, manufacturers could even consider building factories in the US or relocating to Southeast Asia to take advantage of the Taiwanese government’s new “southbound policy” or moving production back to Taiwan.
However, serious challenges to relocation remain, such as supply-chain support, an amicable investment environment and general flexibility and efficiency of resource allocation.
Despite calls for the government to reshuffle its economic and financial team to prepare for the challenges ahead, during the latest Cabinet shake-up, the incumbent economics, finance and national development ministers remained in their posts.
It will soon be apparent whether policymakers are serious about the economy.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US