Beijing is known for playing the long game. Free of four-year election cycles and the constant need to be mindful of the electorate’s opinions, Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leaders seem to think they can afford to wait it out. However, perhaps there is something Beijing could learn from Confucius (孔子) about winning the trust and cooperation of ordinary people through benevolent governance.
Many Taiwanese have been watching Hong Kong as a viable model of what to expect should the CCP ever succeed in its unjustified ambitions to annex Taiwan.
According to the latest Amnesty International Hong Kong annual report, which reviewed the human rights situation in Hong Kong over the past year, there is much cause for concern. It says the situation has continued to deteriorate since the UK handed the territory back to China in 1997. The report was critical of the Hong Kong government for failing to defend the rights of Hong Kongers and of officials for putting their own political gain ahead of human rights.
It cited media censorship and violence against journalists, the prosecutions of three 2014 Umbrella movement student leaders — Amnesty International Hong Kong director Mabel Au said the student leaders’ persecution “smacks of political payback by the authorities” — and the authorities’ apparent feet dragging over the five missing Hong Kong-based booksellers who eventually turned up in the custody of Chinese authorities.
Last year, China’s National People’s Congress (NPC) made an unprecedented interpretation of Hong Kong’s Basic Law, barring — independently of the Hong Kong judiciary — two elected Hong Kong pro-independence politicians, Yau Wai-ching (游蕙禎) and Sixtus “Baggio” Leung (梁頌恆), from taking office after they pledged allegiance to the “Hong Kong nation” and displayed a banner saying “Hong Kong is not China” during a swearing-in ceremony for the Legislative Council.
This was Beijing’s most direct intervention in the territory’s legal and political system since the handover and was a demonstration of how little respect the CCP has for due process, democracy and the freedom of expression.
Criticisms in the report were leveled at the Hong Kong authorities, but they are also a comment on the way Beijing leaders expect the territory to be run and how they are intervening when things are not to their liking.
Even though the former colony is supposed to be run according to a “one country, two systems” model, and despite former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping’s (鄧小平) assurances that things in Hong Kong would remain unchanged “for 50 years,” Chinese authorities, under the guidance of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), are becoming increasingly intrusive and impatient with Hong Kongers wanting to ensure suffrage and a more inclusive democracy.
Xi and the CCP apparently believe that the correct approach to Hong Kong is to restrict democracy, curtail freedom of expression, suppress dissent and intervene in the first instance.
They disregard the idea of government of the people, for the people. Suppressing a proud people in this way is likely to exacerbate the desire for change, not dissipate it, but Beijing will not relent because it believes it is playing the long game. It will continue to grind down opposition until something breaks or until it has its way. It does not seem to have an interest in seeking out a system that Hong Kongers can find acceptable.
Hong Kong is a model for what could happen to Taiwan. Once Beijing has Taiwan in its grasp, it will not let go until it has bent it to its will. Is that something most Taiwanese can contemplate?
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95