It seems right and proper that public employees — military personnel, civil servants and public-school teachers and education professionals — should play an active role in the formation of a nation. This group is different from other people in that they receive their salaries from the state, paid out of tax revenue collected from ordinary people.
Their income is stable — hence the name “iron rice bowl” — quite unlike the huge fluctuations in income ordinary people might have to deal with throughout their lives. When the economy is slow, many people entering the workforce for the first time choose the iron rice bowl positions, seeking this kind of job security.
A sense of responsibility in government employees is manifest among military personnel in martial virtue, in the national spirit; among civil servants it is seen in the devotion to fulfilling one’s duty to the best of one’s ability; in teachers it is the responsibility to inspire, instruct and train other members of society.
The formation of the nation is bolstered by its military, civil service and schools. Whether a nation can function properly and be robust and healthy depends not only on politicians — those in whom power is invested at the ballot box — to lead and create policy, as these, in turn, depend upon the military, civil service and schools to support them and provide a practical foundation.
During the long years of martial law in Taiwan, in which one party monopolized political power, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) entrenched the party-state ideology within this framework. Through ideological consolidation and the offering of special benefits, the idea that the party and state were one and the same became deeply embedded in the minds of many of these public employees. With the lifting of martial law and the advent of democracy, many people within this group routinely opposed reform.
The government held public hearings on pension reform throughout the nation. Neither police nor barriers were able to prevent many retired public employees from staging mass protests. Not that they were there to engage in the debate: they were there only to obstruct. From helping forge the party-state to consolidating a political order through the long years of martial law, they are now unable to countenance reasonable modifications of their interests. It is heartbreaking to see how far such highly respected members of society have fallen.
If democracy is to continue to develop, and Taiwan is to rebuild itself, then it is going to have to cure itself of these deeply ingrained maladies.
To understand how it has come to this, people will have to go all the way back to the Chinese Civil War in 1949, when the People’s Republic of China took over from the Republic of China: What then for the military, the civil service and public-school teachers? What happened to their counterparts in defeated Germany, Italy and Japan in World War II? Indeed, what of these sections of society when East Germany and West Germany reunited, or of the individual nations in eastern Europe following the collapse of the Soviet Union?
Taiwan still has some way to go on the road to transitional justice. Right now, it is impossible to even make reasonable adjustments to public employee’s pensions, or to introduce any reforms, because of the obstructionism of this united group, and how beautifully it is exemplifying all the traditional Confucian virtues.
How on earth is Taiwan going to rid itself of the poison of this party-state ideology and of the self-interested parties it has spawned, to forge a new, healthy public sector made of people showing upright national character and personal integrity?
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Paul Cooper
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Following the resignation of Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba from the presidency of the Liberal Democratic Party, Sanae Takaichi was elected president of the party on Oct. 4. Takaichi is familiar to many Taiwanese due to her many visits to and support for the neighboring island nation. She is widely seen as a protege of late former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe, also a staunch ally of Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) congratulated Takaichi as news broke that she was elected LDP president, calling her a “loyal friend of Taiwan.” She has continuously pushed for closer cooperation between Taiwan and Japan,
RSS