TransAsia Airways Corp dissolved its operations in November last year, but the airline and its former employees still have not agreed on severance packages. The issue has not only left the more than 1,700 former employees frustrated just three weeks before the Lunar New Year holiday, but also raised the question of whether corporate dissolution is the best exit strategy in a case like this.
The issue has ignited discussion about exit strategies for family businesses, particularly about their method and timing. Well-developed exit strategies can have a big impact on the value of a business and inevitably have implications for employees, investors and society as a whole. Apparently, TransAsia — one of the three main businesses of the Lin (林) family empire — did not think through the consequences.
There are some common exit strategies for family businesses, such as selling to management, selling to a third party (including financial investors or competitors), or gradually winding down the business before a formal end. Nonetheless, an abrupt dissolution of business is barely better than doing nothing before it dies. The TransAsia case has broad repercussions and shows how poor succession planning contributes to the failure of family businesses, as the saying goes: Wealth does not pass three generations.
Are family businesses prepared to put a succession plan in place? According to a recent survey conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers Taiwan (PwC Taiwan), they are not. Most Taiwanese family businesses are not adequately prepared for succession — only 9 percent of owners have a formal, written succession plan, compared with 10 percent in China, Hong Kong and Singapore, and lower than the global average of 15 percent. Regarding the separation of ownership and management, 29 percent of Taiwanese family businesses have plans to keep management out of the hands of family members, while 58 percent want management and ownership to remain in the family, higher than the global average of 39 percent, the survey showed.
Most family business leaders expect next-generation family members, rather than professional managers, to take over their business. According to PwC Taiwan, only 11 percent of Taiwanese owners will leave the family business by thinking outside the box, compared with 28 percent in China, 23 percent in Hong Kong and 20 percent in Singapore.
Family businesses are the backbone of the economy, with about 74 percent of publicly listed companies being family-controlled, from small businesses to major corporations, according to a report issued by the Taiwan Institute of Directors in April last year. However, an elderly owner, rivalry between siblings or other family members, as well as rapid changes in the business and the economic environment, have made succession planning an urgent concern for top leaders.
There have been conflicts among Grape King Bio Ltd’s Tseng (曾) family members, struggles between Evergreen Group’s Chang (張) family heirs and infighting between siblings of Taisun Enterprise Co’s Chan (詹) family last year.
For family businesses to be stable and long-lasting, they must step up efforts to create sound succession plans, as well as address the issue of separating ownership and management in corporate governance.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95