Before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) left for China on Sunday for the first time as party leader, former vice president Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) compared Hung’s trip to that made by then-KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰) in 2005.
“Hung’s trip is reminiscent of the so-called ‘ice-breaking journey’ to Beijing made by KMT honorary chairman Lien in 2005, which paved the way for the party’s return to power in 2008,” Wu told reporters hours prior to Hung’s departure.
It is apparent that the fantasy that Hung’s trip — during which she met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Tuesday — would somehow put the KMT back in power in four or eight years’ time is shared by Beijing.
Since President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) took office on May 20, China has never tried to conceal that the primary reason it cut off official cross-strait communication mechanisms and imposed other punitive measures against her administration was Tsai’s refusal to recognize the so-called “1992 consensus,” which is just a sugar-coated reworking of the “one China” principle.
The “1992 consensus,” a term former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) admitted to making up in 2000, refers to a tacit understanding between the KMT and the Chinese government that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
Beijing is clearly hoping that its browbeating of Tsai will force her administration to yield on the “consensus.” However, it is also seeking to make the KMT appear as if it is the only political party competent to negotiate with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) on behalf of Taiwanese.
Such a tactic might have worked in 2008, when a global financial crisis made economic integration with then-fast-growing China tempting.
Another factor contributing to the KMT’s 2008 victory was a high-profile corruption scandal involving former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which prompted many to vote for then-KMT presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
However, what Beijing is forgetting is that Taiwanese voters’ priorities have changed in the post-Ma era.
The DPP neither scrapped its independence platform nor compromised and acknowledged the “1992 consensus” in the run-up to the presidential election.
Despite Tsai’s apparent slide toward the middle ground when running for the top office, most voters understood that supporting Tsai and her party would undoubtedly result in a regression of cross-strait relations.
However, Tsai won nearly 57 percent of the 12 million valid votes cast in the Jan. 16 election. The reason is simple: The closer cross-strait ties and Taipei’s growing economic dependence on Beijing during Ma’s eight-year rule only benefited the elite, while ordinary Taiwanese were left to deal with the fallout.
The KMT and the CCP can continue to hold their annual get-togethers for as long as they deem necessary and talk about the possibility of signing a cross-strait peace accord as often as they want. Whatever agreements the two parties reach, they can only ever achieve party-to-party status and would not represent Taiwan and its 23 million people.
The CCP has to bear in mind that it would be riskier for it than for the KMT to continue as if the cross-strait dialogue is the exclusive property of two parties. The chance of the KMT making a political comeback is already slight. It will be even more remote after its ill-gotten assets are returned to the government.
Therefore, Beijing is betting on a lost cause if it thinks excluding the DPP from cross-strait talks will return the KMT to power and advance Beijing’s ultimate goal — unification.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US