Jacques Picoux (畢安生), a French national and retired lecturer on French language and literature at National Taiwan University, was last week found dead outside his home. Last year, his partner of 35 years, Tseng Ching-chao (曾敬超), died of cancer. Unable to marry the man he loved, Picoux now joins him in the afterlife, where they can be together once more. That it came to that is truly tragic.
Just prior to this, actor Lee Tien-chu (李天柱) invoked God’s name during a Golden Bell Awards ceremony and said that homosexuality would lead to the destruction of humankind, in comments immediately criticized in Taiwan.
I am a Christian, but I feel that in the past few years the Christian church in Taiwan has systematically opposed homosexuality, and so Lee’s comments came as little surprise.
Those who support the legalization of same-sex marriage mainly say that people are entitled to equal rights, while those who oppose it mostly say that it would lead to the break down of the traditional family and traditional marriage. So who is qualified to define what marriage is?
On June 26, 2013, the US Supreme Court ruled in a constitutional interpretation that same-sex marriage was legal, a major step for marriage equality.
The UK also passed legislation allowing the legalization of same-sex marriage, which was officially implemented in March 2014.
Will Taiwan follow their example? When will Taiwanese accept homosexuals?
Denmark became in 1989 the first country to officially register homosexual partnerships. In 2001, the Netherlands became the first country to legalize same-sex marriage.
The current global trend is that more people, regardless of race, gender, age, social status or religious affiliation are becoming accepting of same-sex marriage. In 2005, only 28 percent of people in the US were in favor of marriage equality; by 2013 this had changed to 50 percent.
However, the mainstream Christian stance, and this includes in Taiwan, remains conservative and resistant to change.
In Taiwan, groups against gays and certain sections of the media have set out to demonize homosexuals, accusing them of wild parties, drug abuse and promiscuity, as if heterosexuals would never engage in such activities.
Those opposed to same-sex marriage say that children raised by same-sex couples are denied a father figure or a mother’s love, and that this could somehow define their sexual orientation.
However, surely that argument falls flat when you consider that most homosexuals were born to heterosexual couples and perhaps raised in those families. Is love only love when it is between a man and a woman?
In Taiwan, how many unhappy couples, married or otherwise, are there? Is it really true to say that extramarital affairs or relationships ending or divorce are extremely rare occurrences among heterosexuals in this nation?
People opposed to homosexuality and marriage equality want to pretend these people do not exist, but wishing something away does not make it disappear.
In Taiwan, homosexuals are a minority group and the legalization of same-sex marriage should be seen as a fundamental human right; indeed, it should be constitutionally guaranteed.
In 2013, during a visit to Brazil, Pope Francis said: “If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?”
The pope went on to say that there is nothing in Catholic teaching that would suggest that anyone should be subjected to prejudice or rejection as a result of their sexual orientation and that all people should be treated equally.
In the New Testament, John 8:3 relates the story of how the Pharisees took a woman caught in the act of adultery to court and sentenced her to stoning.
When asked to comment, Jesus called on those who could truly say they were without sin themselves to cast the first stone. The point was, if somebody is found guilty of a sin, you should forgive them and give them the chance to understand where they erred so that they might change their behavior.
At the same time, it teaches the importance of remembering that you yourself have sinned.
The Bible says that you should “love your neighbor as yourself.”
Perhaps Christians cannot condone or accept homosexual acts, but how should they treat homosexuals? Should they try to understand them in as an objective way as possible? Should they show them compassion and acceptance?
The Bible says: “For God so loved the world...” This includes the poor, the disabled and the sinners. Surely, this would also include homosexuals.
Johnny Hsieh is an assistant professor of marketing at Kao Yuan University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US