Our excuse for failing to respond to mass atrocities used to be that we did not fully appreciate the horrors until it was too late.
“If only we had known,” became one refrain, along with: “Never again!”
In Syria, we are deprived of that excuse: We have a daily window into war crimes. If you are on Twitter, follow a seven-year-old girl in Aleppo, Bana al-Abed (@alabedbana) who, with her mom’s help, is tweeting the carnage around her.
One tweet shows a video clip of al-Abed looking out the window and plugging her ears as bombs drop.
“I am very afraid I will die tonight,” she said in imperfect English. “This bombs will kill me now.”
“This is my friend house bombed,” al-Abed said, attaching a photograph. “She’s killed. I miss her so much.”
Her mother, Fatemah, an English teacher who has been teaching al-Abed English for several years, chimes in as well.
“Sleeping as you can hear the bombs fall,” Fatemah said on Twitter. “I will tweet tomorrow if we are alive.”
I interviewed Fatemah and al-Abed by e-mail, which they access on a cellphone that they recharge with a solar panel. Al-Abed’s school was destroyed by a bomb last year, and Fatemah said that they were surviving on pasta and rice that were running out.
“Bana is very weak,” her mom told me.
Russia and Syria appear to be deliberately targeting civilians like al-Abed. The aim seems to be to bomb and starve civilians into exhaustion and submission, so that they flee or no longer support the opposition, or else support extremists regarded as better fighters. That would bolster the Syrian government narrative that the opposition consists of terrorists who must be fought.
For those of us who generally admire US President Barack Obama as a man of principle, it is wrenching to watch his paralysis. As I see it, Syria has been his worst mistake, a huge blot on his legacy.
We cannot be sure that more robust strategies advocated by US Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton, former US CIA director David Petraeus, US Secretary of State John Kerry and others would have succeeded, but Obama’s approach has manifestly failed — and after five years, it should be time to reconsider strategy.
Some of you are thinking: “This is horrific, but what can the West possibly do?”
In a previous column, I quoted former US Joint Chiefs of Staff vice chairman James Cartwright about the “many things we can be doing now” in Syria. Charles Lister, author of a recent book on Syria, has written a detailed nine-page plan of action for the US.
I have suggested cratering Syrian military runways with missiles fired from Turkey so that Syrian military aircraft cannot take off — Turkish officials have told me that they would go along with this.
Of course, we should not dispatch ground troops. However, if we had cratered Syrian runways several years ago, as many suggested, the horrors of barrel bombing would have been reduced.
One sign that curbing Syrian bombing is feasible is that we are already doing it. In August, the US quietly imposed a de facto no-fly zone over parts of northern Syria where US advisers are located. I am wary of military adventurism and opposed the Iraq War and the surge in Afghanistan, but I also note that in places from Kosovo to Kurdistan, the military toolbox has saved lives. Obama conducted a military intervention on Mount Sinjar on the Iraq-Syria border that saved the lives of thousands of Yazidi.
The Syrian government has shown that it does not respond to moral appeals, but to credible threats of military force. In 2013, when Obama looked as if he might order airstrikes, Syria hurriedly agreed to give up chemical weapons.
Kerry has pleaded with the White House for more aggressive military measures precisely to make a ceasefire more achievable; instead, Obama undercut his secretary of state and denied him leverage.
As a senator, Obama used to complain to me and others that then-US president George W. Bush was too passive about atrocities in Sudan’s Darfur region.
“I am strongly supportive of us doing what it takes to stop the slaughter that is taking place, and I think that no-fly zones have to be part of that formula,” Obama told me in 2006.
He should listen to himself.
Look, cratering runways might not work. It is easy for those of us on the sidelines to agitate; everything is always more complex than it seems. Except when it is simpler: Former US president Bill Clinton says that his biggest foreign policy mistake was not stopping the Rwanda genocide.
Let us have this discussion, and also acknowledge the risks of remaining passive. So far, Obama’s paralysis has been linked to the loss of perhaps half a million lives in Syria, the rise of extremist groups like the Islamic State, genocide against the Yazidi and Christians, the worst refugee crisis in more than 60 years and the rise of ultranationalist groups in Europe.
Aleppo might fall, and lives like al-Abed’s hang in the balance.
If we do not act after half a million deaths, will we after 1 million? After 2 million? When?
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95