Sun, Oct 09, 2016 - Page 7 News List

Conflict in Syria a blot on US President Barack Obama’s legacy

By Nick Kristof  /  NY Times News Service

Our excuse for failing to respond to mass atrocities used to be that we did not fully appreciate the horrors until it was too late.

“If only we had known,” became one refrain, along with: “Never again!”

In Syria, we are deprived of that excuse: We have a daily window into war crimes. If you are on Twitter, follow a seven-year-old girl in Aleppo, Bana al-Abed (@alabedbana) who, with her mom’s help, is tweeting the carnage around her.

One tweet shows a video clip of al-Abed looking out the window and plugging her ears as bombs drop.

“I am very afraid I will die tonight,” she said in imperfect English. “This bombs will kill me now.”

“This is my friend house bombed,” al-Abed said, attaching a photograph. “She’s killed. I miss her so much.”

Her mother, Fatemah, an English teacher who has been teaching al-Abed English for several years, chimes in as well.

“Sleeping as you can hear the bombs fall,” Fatemah said on Twitter. “I will tweet tomorrow if we are alive.”

I interviewed Fatemah and al-Abed by e-mail, which they access on a cellphone that they recharge with a solar panel. Al-Abed’s school was destroyed by a bomb last year, and Fatemah said that they were surviving on pasta and rice that were running out.

“Bana is very weak,” her mom told me.

Russia and Syria appear to be deliberately targeting civilians like al-Abed. The aim seems to be to bomb and starve civilians into exhaustion and submission, so that they flee or no longer support the opposition, or else support extremists regarded as better fighters. That would bolster the Syrian government narrative that the opposition consists of terrorists who must be fought.

For those of us who generally admire US President Barack Obama as a man of principle, it is wrenching to watch his paralysis. As I see it, Syria has been his worst mistake, a huge blot on his legacy.

We cannot be sure that more robust strategies advocated by US Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton, former US CIA director David Petraeus, US Secretary of State John Kerry and others would have succeeded, but Obama’s approach has manifestly failed — and after five years, it should be time to reconsider strategy.

Some of you are thinking: “This is horrific, but what can the West possibly do?”

In a previous column, I quoted former US Joint Chiefs of Staff vice chairman James Cartwright about the “many things we can be doing now” in Syria. Charles Lister, author of a recent book on Syria, has written a detailed nine-page plan of action for the US.

I have suggested cratering Syrian military runways with missiles fired from Turkey so that Syrian military aircraft cannot take off — Turkish officials have told me that they would go along with this.

Of course, we should not dispatch ground troops. However, if we had cratered Syrian runways several years ago, as many suggested, the horrors of barrel bombing would have been reduced.

One sign that curbing Syrian bombing is feasible is that we are already doing it. In August, the US quietly imposed a de facto no-fly zone over parts of northern Syria where US advisers are located. I am wary of military adventurism and opposed the Iraq War and the surge in Afghanistan, but I also note that in places from Kosovo to Kurdistan, the military toolbox has saved lives. Obama conducted a military intervention on Mount Sinjar on the Iraq-Syria border that saved the lives of thousands of Yazidi.

This story has been viewed 2111 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top