The objections of military personnel, public-school teachers and civil servants have been the loudest since the National Committee on Pension Reform convened in June to tackle the problems plaguing the nation’s various pension systems, most of which are likely to go bankrupt within a few decades.
A group of former military personnel, civil servants and public-school teachers is planning to take its appeal to the streets on Armed Forces Day on Saturday. Saying that they have sacrificed their youth to the nation and suffered long absences from their families, representatives from the group said that the protest was aimed at defending their dignity and respect, adding that they support pension reforms, but that any change should not be carried out retroactively.
What they mean is that the controversial 18 percent preferential interest rate given to military personnel, civil servants and public school teachers who started working before 1995 should stay.
This begs the questions: Who in their respective work does not contribute to society as a whole? Should everyone not be treated with dignity and respect? If the group’s logic is to be accepted, all workers in the nation should have the same reasons to take to the streets.
Former military personnel, public-school teachers and civil servants enjoy generous benefits compared with their counterparts in the manufacturing and farming sectors, particularly with the 18 percent preferential interest rate that was implemented to alleviate hardship among civil servants during the 1950s and 1960s. However, the circumstances that necessitated the policy have since changed.
No one is denying the contributions to society made by former military personnel, civil servants and public-school teachers, nor is anyone stigmatizing them. However, being on the government’s payroll and having served the nation, should the group, more so than anyone, not be more attentive about and understanding of the financial woes facing the nation?
According to reports by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics and the Ministry of Finance, the government allocates about NT$310 billion (US$9.75 billion) annually to the pension system for military personnel, public-school teachers and civil servants, with NT$77.8 billion being spent on the 18 percent preferential interest rate payments.
Considering the government has about NT$17.75 trillion in unfunded liabilities, it is practically borrowing money to pay the pensions.
While it is reasonable for the group to enjoy relatively higher salaries given their positions, it is simply absurd when they retire, but still receive monthly payments that are equal to, or higher than, their pre-retirement salaries.
According to a study by the Ministry of Civil Service, the average monthly pension for the nation’s 134,849 retired and claiming public servants, including the 18 percent interest paid on special savings accounts and monthly pension payments, is NT$50,000 per person per month, and 646 retired civil servants receive more than NT$100,000 per month, while 8,292 receive between NT$80,000 and NT$100,000.
The Council of Grand Justices’ Constitutional Interpretation No. 485 states that, given limited state resources, social legislation must “consider the economic and financial conditions of the state” and “ensure fairness between the beneficiaries and the rest of society.”
In light of the nation’s financial difficulties and with various pension systems on the brink of collapse, it can be only hoped that military personnel, public-school teachers and civil servants do not insist on protecting their benefits and rights, without any regard for how the debt problem might transfer to future generations, leaving the possibility of today’s youth being left without retirement funds.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
On May 13, the Legislative Yuan passed an amendment to Article 6 of the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) that would extend the life of nuclear reactors from 40 to 60 years, thereby providing a legal basis for the extension or reactivation of nuclear power plants. On May 20, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators used their numerical advantage to pass the TPP caucus’ proposal for a public referendum that would determine whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should resume operations, provided it is deemed safe by the authorities. The Central Election Commission (CEC) has