Minister of the Interior Yeh Jiunn-rong’s (葉俊榮) visit to Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島) on Tuesday has sparked a frenzied discussion about its significance.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) claimed it was a move by President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration to salvage its plunging approval ratings.
While Presidential Office spokesman Alex Huang (黃重諺) said Yeh’s trip was not aimed at “paving the way” for a presidential visit, he added that the office does not rule out such a visit by Tsai.
There have also been media reports alleging that Yeh was actually a “stand-in,” meaning that he went in Tsai’s stead, and that Tsai had initially hoped to go herself.
Tsai might have wanted to go; either way, that was not the point. The point was that the message of her having the intention to go (true or not) — and she did send a Cabinet minister over — has been spread.
The KMT said the visit came “too late” to win the public’s support, referring to Tsai’s approval ratings. However, a closer look at information provided by the group that conducted the latest poll shows that after three months in office, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — who took office in 2008 with a record-high number of votes — had a higher disapproval rating than Tsai and a relatively lower approval rating.
Poll numbers can be alarming, but they are hardly a cause for any prompt or rash response. Yeh’s trip to the island, as he said, was in line with the five proposals the president put forward last month for Itu Aba, including turning it into a humanitarian service center and carrying out international scientific research on ecology, geology, seismology and meteorology.
According to a Central News Agency report, Yeh said that an automated weather station and a tidal observatory are expected to be completed next month and that the ministry is considering sharing information obtained from the satellite tracking station with other nations to promote international cooperation.
Calling for global cooperation is a friendly gesture to neighboring rival claimants in the South China Sea and suits the administration’s “new southbound policy.”
Moreover, by visiting Itu Aba and intimating that Tsai might be willing to visit it, the government has, to some extent, demonstrated its goodwill toward Beijing, as securing Taiwan’s claim over the island has been a rare common ground between Tsai’s administration and the Chinese government.
In the set of guidelines for the “new southbound policy” that the Presidential Office made public on Tuesday, a section on regional peace and development underlines the importance of cross-strait cooperation.
“[The administration] does not rule out the possibility that at an appropriate time in the future, negotiations and conversations on related issues and possible cooperation with [China] would be undertaken,” it said.
That was clearly intended as an implicit retort to suspicions that the “new southbound policy” was based on the idea of confronting China.
As Cambodia-born KMT Legislator Lin Li-chan (林麗嬋) said, the government’s policy might be compromised if Southeast Asian countries believe that working with Taiwan would damage their relations with China.
While Cambodia might be a less than convincing example — considering it is a close ally of China — and keeping in mind that there is room for Taiwan to gain from Beijing’s strained relationships with some Southeast Asian countries, insofar as regional peace is what the Tsai administration upholds, improving the relationship with China is a difficult, but must-do task.
The olive branch has been extended. Communication requires both parties’ goodwill rather than a forced-upon and manufactured consensus.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers