The Act Governing the Handling of Ill-gotten Properties by Political Parties and Their Affiliate Organizations (政黨及其附隨組織不當取得財產處理條例) has taken effect and ended the unfair political competition that has worked in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) favor thanks to its enormous assets. This is an important step toward the normalization of party politics in Taiwan.
The KMT might feel that it has lost its place now that it has lost its grip on power, but it will not sit idly and wait for its execution. As the party does all in its power to resist this fate, the nation is witnessing the beginning of another long period of savage struggle between the ruling and opposition parties.
There are several approaches that the KMT could use to protect its assets. It could liquidate all of its remaining assets and divide them among its staff, thus frustrating the government’s attempts at recovery. It could take its case to the courts or the Council of Grand Justices for a constitutional interpretation. Even if it failed to prevent the government from pursuing its goal, it would at least be able to slow down the process, which could leave room to turn things around as the political climate changes.
Another approach would be to resort to political warfare. Although the party’s legislators are in the minority and have had too many failures, they could adopt all-out, ruthless tactics in the legislature and try hard to bring down the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government’s policies in an attempt to stage a comeback.
Finally, the party might launch a battle for public sympathy by representing the government’s pursuit of the recovery of its assets as a political witch hunt.
Of course, the government fully understands the KMT’s options. Premier Lin Chuan (林全) has explicitly warned the KMT that it would not get away with using ill-gotten party assets to pay its workers’ salaries.
DPP Legislator Wellington Koo (顧立雄), who is slated to head the Committee of Illegal Party Asset Settlement, has said that the assets issue will be handled before the end of the year. KMT legislators have responded by saying that if he moves too fast, he might crash.
After winning the legislative battle on the recovery of ill-gotten party assets, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and her administration will try to settle the issue as soon as possible, as she must also deal with a five-day workweek and the issue of one “fixed” and one “floating” day off per week; the nomination of the president and vice president of the Control Yuan; and controversy over a national conference on judicial reform.
None of these issues are easily resolved and they will result in turmoil. If the assets issue drags on for an extended period, the situation will become even more complicated.
The KMT is trying to slow things down and lump all of these controversial issues together to increase its bargaining power and cause the government to get bogged down by the assets issue in the same way that the Taipei City Government has become bogged down by the Taipei Dome case: Although it is clear that the issue involves many illegal aspects, there is no way to cut the Gordian Knot in one fell swoop. As the case drags on, the public will begin to lose patience. The government might have the upper hand, but the outcome remains uncertain.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US