On Tuesday last week, a tour bus caught fire on a freeway in Taoyuan, killing all 26 people on board. Such a tragedy calls for deep reflection on the factors that led to the fire.
A motor vehicle is a complex structure with all kinds of mechanical and electrical components crammed into a confined space. These systems are hot and greasy and when the vehicle is in motion it is often subjected to dust, friction, vibrations and high temperatures. For all these reasons, motor vehicles pose a considerable fire risk.
The regulations governing the management of transport enterprises state that bus operators should clearly mark emergency exits, including safety doors and roof escape hatches, fire extinguishers — of which there must be at least two — and window breakers — of which there must be at least three — with break points marked at the four corners of each glass window. Operating instructions for each exit must also be displayed.
To prevent fires, bus interiors must be made using fire-retardant materials that have been tested and certified.
From the point of view of fire science, motor vehicles have special fire-growth characteristics. When a vehicle fire is growing, it is usually fueled by highly flammable liquid oils that release a great amount of heat. Furthermore, the motion of a moving vehicle provides plenty of oxygen to feed the fire.
A fire burning under such conditions generates a large amount of toxic combustion and heat as it penetrates the interior of the vehicle. In a single-door bus, people must react quickly by making their way to the escape hatches or breaking the windows to get out of the vehicle.
However, this generally has to be accomplished in a very limited time amid thick smoke and in an atmosphere of panic. Fatal flashovers can easily occur and firefighters might be unable to arrive in time.
Because of the special threat that vehicle fires pose to people’s lives, it is especially important to slow the spread of the fire to make time for people to escape. Because it is not possible to install fixed firefighting equipment in the limited space of a vehicle, the materials used in vehicle interiors should have low flammability, so that even if they do start burning when they come into contact with fire, they will burn slowly, giving drivers and passengers sufficient time to detect the fire and extinguish it or escape the burning vehicle.
It is therefore important to reinforce the fire-response component of bus drivers’ professional training courses and serious consideration should be given to organizing joint inspections by highway police and prosecutors and conducting roadside vehicle safety inspections.
The authorities should review and amend their policies. It is also necessary to remind the public that strict safety regulations apply in the crowded and confined spaces inside buses.
However, given Taiwan’s traffic density, no matter what precautions are taken, last week’s bus fire will surely not be the last.
Lu Sohu-chien is an assistant professor at Wu Feng University’s Department of Fire Science.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers