Presumptive Democratic US presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton knows she has a trust problem, and it might be the biggest threat to her campaign for the White House.
She has tried using humility to fix it, deflecting blame and acknowledging mistakes, but so far none of her attempts have worked.
A growing majority of Americans say they distrust Clinton, and she is slipping nationally and in battleground states in match-ups with US presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump after the conclusion of an FBI investigation involving her handling of top-secret information as America’s top diplomat.
A New York Times/CBS national survey released on Thursday found Clinton’s six-point lead over Trump last month evaporating to a tie, with each garnering 40 percent support.
A whopping 67 percent of voters said Clinton is not honest or trustworthy, up five points from last month. Trump fared only modestly better at 62 percent, unchanged from the previous month.
A Quinnipiac poll released on Wednesday found Clinton’s comfortable leads in Florida and Pennsylvania last month narrowing to a dead heat, with Ohio remaining a tie — even as Clinton and her campaign spend millions on TV advertising in all three states. A key shift in the survey was that Clinton lost a large lead for having “higher moral standards,” while Trump widened his lead on who’s more “honest and trustworthy.”
LIKE HUSBAND, LIKE WIFE
The trust issue haunts Clinton, even against an opponent that some surveys show is the most unpopular in the history of modern polling. Questions of trustworthiness are as old as the Clinton brand itself — former US president Bill Clinton faced questions about his honesty in both of his campaigns for the White House, the result of a host of controversies including revelations during the 1992 primary campaign about his extramarital affairs and the investigation into into a land deal known as Whitewater, which also embroiled his wife.
However, Bill Clinton overcame the trust deficit with empathy. At the time, he consistently scored high in surveys when voters were asked whether he cared about their needs and problems. Hillary Clinton readily admits she does not have the same political skills as her husband. She has a modest empathy advantage over Trump, but neither scores well: A Fox News poll released last last month found that 45 percent of Americans said “cares about people like me” describes Clinton, while 35 percent said it describes Trump.
In recent weeks, Clinton has attempted to confront her shortcomings head-on.
“I personally know I have work to do on this front. A lot of people tell pollsters they don’t trust me. I don’t like hearing that and I’ve thought a lot about what’s behind it,” Clinton said on June 27 at the International Women’s Forum in Chicago.
She admitted making “mistakes,” which she did not specify, but also suggested she is misunderstood.
“Now, maybe we can persuade people to change their minds by marshaling facts and making arguments to rebut negative attacks,” she said. “You can’t just talk someone into trusting you, you’ve got to earn it. So yes, I can say the reason I sometimes sound careful with my words is not that I’m hiding something, it’s just that I’m careful with my words.”
SCOLDING FROM COMEY
FBI Director James Comey last week said that Hillary Clinton’s use of a private e-mail server as US secretary of state does not merit charges in a court of law, and US Attorney General Loretta Lynch concurred.
However, Comey also gave the Democrat a tongue-lashing for being “extremely careless” with classified information. In a court of public opinion, she is still on trial, and so far the results are not good.
Along with the New York Times poll that found her dropping, a McClatchy/Marist poll conducted over five days starting on the day of Comey’s announcement found Clinton’s national lead narrowing from nine points in April to three points.
Trump routinely calls his opponent “Crooked Hillary,” seeking to capitalize on the perception of her as dishonest. He and other Republicans have hammered Clinton on the e-mail issue. While she has acknowledged her use of private server and e-mail address was a mistake, Clinton has also tried to deflect Comey’s harsh assessment, suggesting that any classified material she had on her server were sent by career officials at the US Department of State.
A DASH OF SEXISM?
As they gear up for an intense 15 weeks after this month’s Democratic convention and work to elect the first woman president, Clinton’s allies see more than a dash of sexism in perceptions of her as dishonest and untrustworthy. Many point to a body of research that says Americans tend to view ambitious and successful women more negatively than they do men.
“As with all women leaders, Hillary has been held to a different standard her entire career,” EMILY’s List spokeswoman Marcy Stech said. “But she hasn’t let that stop her from doing what’s right, no matter who thinks it’s unpopular.”
In keeping with other themes of her campaign, Clinton is less shy than she was in 2008 about discussing the sexism that she and other powerful women face in American society.
In an article published in May’s New York magazine, Clinton said society is “accustomed to think of women’s ambition being made manifest in ways that we don’t approve of, or that we find off-putting.”
She attributed it to “a fear that ambition will crowd out everything else — relationships, marriage, children, family, homemaking, all the other parts [of life] that are important to me and important to most women I know.”
When asked by New York magazine if part of the phenomenon is that men worry ambitious women will take up space that has traditionally belonged to them, Clinton concurred.
“I think it’s the competition,” she said. “Like, if you do this, there won’t be room for some of us, and that’s not fair.”
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past