The Chinese government has once again demonstrated that it is not sincere about “putting politics aside” in cross-strait exchanges. Politics might be its priority, even for the entertainment business.
Last week, Taiwanese director and actor Leon Dai (戴立忍) — who was to play the lead role in the Chinese movie No Other Love (沒有別的愛), directed by Chinese director and actress Zhao Wei (趙薇) — was accused of being pro-Taiwanese independence because of his participation in social movements in Taiwan.
At first, Dai said that he has never been a supporter of Taiwanese independence, with the movie’s production team backing him.
However, due to overwhelming public pressure, the production team and investors had Dai replaced, forcing him to issue a statement detailing his family background, explaining why he has taken part in social movements and declaring that he has always considered himself Chinese.
However, the Chinese audience did not believe Dai and even started attacking his girlfriend, Taiwanese actress Gwei Lun-mei (桂綸鎂), as the girlfriend of a pro-Taiwanese independence actor.
This is not an isolated incident.
Earlier this year, Chou Tzu-yu (周子瑜), a Taiwanese member of South Korean pop group TWICE, was accused of sympathizing with the Taiwanese independence movement and was forced to apologize on camera for waving a Republic of China (ROC) flag on a South Korean TV show.
Taiwanese pop diva A-mei (阿妹) was banned from China for several years for singing the ROC national anthem at former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) inauguration ceremony in 2000.
The witch hunt is not limited to Taiwanese entertainers.
On Friday, Japan-based model/actress Kiko Mizuhara was forced to apologize on camera because she “liked” a photograph on Instagram of Chinese dissident artist Ai Weiwei (艾未未) making an inappropriate gesture at Tiananmen Square — a national symbol of China.
Zhao herself has also fallen victim to extreme nationalism in China.
In 2002, she became a target of public criticism — and even physical assault — when she was photographed wearing a dress with a Japanese rising-sun symbol on it.
Zhao was accused of sympathizing with Japanese imperialism and was forced to apologize under threat from numerous TV stations to boycott her.
Has China not been saying, “let politics be politics and let entertainment be entertainment,” and that China and Taiwan should put aside political differences while enhancing cross-strait exchanges?
Has China not been pressuring President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) to recognize the so-called “1992 consensus,” a supposed understanding between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese government that both sides of the Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means?
If China was sincere about what it has been saying, no entertainers would have been subjected to a political witch hunt, especially when the social movements that Dai took part in did not even involve Taiwanese independence.
If China is sincere about the “1992 consensus,” then Taiwanese entertainers should not be boycotted for singing the ROC national anthem or waving the ROC flag in public, as the ROC is just a different interpretation of “one China.”
The examples show that China is never sincere about what it says and its so-called “concessions” are just sugar-coated poison pills that no one should take seriously.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS