Maybe it is because President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) first political dealings were as a negotiator for Taiwan’s membership in a number of international organizations, such as the WTO, that she has always portrayed a calm personality. However, in testing times, as she has faced since taking over as president, perhaps she should demonstrate decisiveness.
In Ing’s Clique: The Last Mile to Light Up Taiwan (英派：點亮台灣的一哩路), which was published during last year’s presidential campaign, Tsai said that she had heard people describe her as expressionless, cold or appearing indifferent. She said that such an appearance is important as a negotiator to prevent others from discovering what she is thinking or feeling.
Other people who have worked closely with Tsai, and were interviewed for her book, said that she always remains calm and does not make a decision until she has thoroughly considered all possible options and consequences.
That is certainly the type of character that a nation facing challenges needs — someone who does not make rash decisions, but responds to situations in a rational manner.
However, being a head of state is not just about being able to make rational decisions. A nation’s leader must also have charisma — a trait that makes a leader different from a policy adviser.
Taiwan is certainly in a troubled time, after eight years under former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, which brought Taiwan further under the territorial ambitions of China, widened the gap between wealthy people and those who are economically disadvantaged, and left a welfare system on the brink of collapse and an unbalanced housing market, among other problems.
Since Tsai was sworn in as president on May 20, some issues have surfaced repeatedly, including a labor dispute at the state-owned China Airlines and controversial reforms to the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法). More recent issues have also been widely discussed, such as animal abuse at a marine base and the alleged accidental firing of an anti-ship missile that destroyed a fishing boat, killing its captain and injuring three crew members.
Take the missile mishap as an example: The government’s handling was satisfactory. Upon learning about the incident, Premier Lin Chuan (林全), who was at a legislative meeting, immediately asked Vice Premier Lin Hsi-yao (林錫耀) to go to Kaohsiung, where the navy base and the victim’s family are. The vice premier apologized, ordered an investigation and promised that the government would take full responsibility for the incident.
Tsai, who was on a state visit to Taiwan’s Latin American allies, was briefed, but she did not make a statement — she attended pre-scheduled events and acted as if nothing had happened.
Tsai waited until she arrived in Taiwan before commenting on the missile blunder, perhaps because “when the mission of the state visit ends, it is te time for other missions to begin,” as she said at a news conference at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport.
Her handling was adequate in a practical sense, but politically weak.
The public expects the president to comment on significant incidents immediately, even if she is abroad, and she should have canceled some events to attend meetings in response to the incident.
The crisis could have been an opportunity for Tsai to show the public her leadership and decisiveness, but unfortunately, she missed it.
Although the government’s handling was satisfactory, the president’s actions were not decisive enough.
Similar situations have occurred since Tsai’s administration has come to office, making some people feel that the government is somewhat lost or chaotic.
It is time for Tsai to get out of her “negotiator” mode and show some strong leadership.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS