Amid efforts by President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) government to ramp up its “new southbound policy,” there was a disturbing reminder that such overseas ventures are not without risk, as a subsidiary of Formosa Plastics Corp on Thursday took responsibility for a toxic discharge from a steel plant in Vietnam that led to massive fish deaths along more than 200km of coastline beginning in early April.
An estimated 60.5 tonnes of dead fish washed ashore, threatening the fishing, tourism and food production sectors, as well as triggering public protests in Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City and Ha Tinh Province.
In a video aired on Vietnamese television, Formosa Ha Tinh Steel chairman Chen Yuan-cheng (陳源成) said the company accepted full blame for the fish deaths and asked the Vietnamese for forgiveness.
He said the company was working to fix shortcomings at the plant’s wastewater treatment facility that were behind the disaster.
The company blamed the spill on its contractors, but said it would pay US$500 million to help with a clean-up and pay compensation to fishermen and others affected by the spill.
However, an apology has taken more than two months, with Formosa Ha Tinh Steel and the Vietnamese government initially insisting that the plant was not to blame for the disaster and that the plant’s US$45 million wastewater treatment system had the necessary permits and met national standards.
Now Hanoi says wastewater containing cyanide, carbolic acids and other toxins was released into the sea during a test run of the plant.
Perhaps it is a coincidence, but the mea culpa came just two weeks after Formosa Plastics Group confirmed that the scheduled launch date of June 18 for the steel mill’s No. 1 furnace had been postponed and no new one set, amid reports that Vietnamese authorities were demanding that the group pay US$70 million in back taxes, as well as paperwork delays.
One cannot help but wonder if Vietnamese authorities were using the tax bill and red tape to pressure the company into taking responsibility for the spill, which had become a key test of Hanoi’s ability to balance its desire for more foreign investment with its willingness to force investors to comply with national regulations and standards.
Formosa Plastics Group and its subsidiaries have a rather dismal environmental track record. To cite just two examples, the US Department of Justice announced in September 2009 that Formosa Plastics Corp, Texas, and Formosa Plastics Corp, Louisiana, would spend more than US$10 million on pollution controls to address violations at their petrochemical plants in Point Comfort and Baton Rouge, and had agreed to pay a civil penalty of US$2.8 million to resolve violations of four laws, while in May, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality announced that a Formosa Plastics Corp plant had dumped plastic pellets into Lavaca Bay.
Formosa Plastics Group only decided to build the steel plant in Vietnam after it ran into difficulties with the environmental review process for plans to build the plant in Yunlin County.
As Taiwanese corporations expand overseas, both they and the government should remember that they are seen as representatives of the nation, a nation that needs all the friends it can get. With the government eager to help businesses expand beyond the Chinese market, it should do whatever it can to convince local firms to be good corporate citizens wherever they operate.
Unfortunately, too many in the business world have the mindset shown by a former Formosa Ha Tinh Steel official, who amid the initial complaints about the fish kill said that Vietnam had to choose between “catching fish and shrimp and building a modern steel industry.”
Taiwanese have made it clear that they are no longer willing to tolerate such Hobson choices; they must make it clear that they will not tolerate Taiwanese companies investing abroad and trashing the environment.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers