There have been reports that a majority of Taiwanese want the nation to join the UN, regardless of what the US and China might think.
According to the same reports, people are also dissatisfied with Taiwan’s international status. The constant threats and pressure from China is certainly the main reason for this, but the “non-normality” of Taiwan itself is another important factor.
If Taiwan itself is not normal, its international status cannot improve, even without China blocking it. Taiwan would remain an international aberration even if it continued to console itself, collectively talking about being sovereign and independent. It cannot even define its territory, so why the talk about sovereignty?
The most “non-normal” thing about Taiwan is that after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was chased out of China, it ruled the nation for about 70 years. Relying on a metaphysical slogan — “one China, different interpretations” — it claimed that its territory included the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and other members of the UN.
Taiwanese’s feelings of identity and territory have been destroyed by the Chinese Communist Party’s propaganda and the KMT’s brainwashing, and their common sense has been so numbed that they no longer think that there is anything strange about the KMT’s delusional territorial claims.
The first step toward Taiwan’s normalization must be to accept that the surreal and delusional territorial claims are tantamount to recognizing that the nation has no defined territory.
It is like the way someone who says “wherever I lay my hat is my home” has, in fact, no home. A place without a defined territory cannot be a nation and it cannot receive international recognition.
Taiwanese have been deceived and living in an illusory state of pretense for far too long. It is time to come down and step on solid ground and prove that Taiwanese no longer believe in the absurd, exaggerated delusion and pragmatically, humbly and rationally announce to the world that Taiwan’s territory is restricted to Taiwan proper and the Penghu Archipelago. As for the status of Kinmen and Matsu, that would require further discussion.
The size of the area is similar that of the Netherlands and the population is greater than in three-quarters of UN nations. The educational level, social development and industrial potential is superior to more than half the world’s nations.
Due to Chinese obstruction, Taiwan has been unable to join the UN as an equal member of the international community.
The world must be made aware of this great humiliation and injustice. China might be strong, but innumerable challenges to its survival exist, and the consensus among the international community in general and the US, Japan and the EU in particular is that they will no longer accept military attacks by dictatorships or authoritarian governments on democratic and free nations.
If Taiwanese continue to work hard to improve and consolidate democracy and develop the nation’s industry, it is just a matter of time before things change. When that happens, there will be a wave of recognition of Taiwan.
Based on a foundation of reality, the administration of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) should build a national consensus behind the creation of a new constitution or the amendment of the current one.
If the government is unable to take the first step, Taiwanese can forget about normalizing the nation.
Peng Ming-min is a former presidential adviser
Translated by Perry Svensson
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS