During Ramadan, the Muslim month of fasting, which is observed by China’s Uighurs, the Chinese government used the promotion of Chinese culture as an excuse to force students to eat zongzi, glutinous rice dumplings wrapped in bamboo leaves that are traditionally eaten during the Dragon Boat Festival.
Threatening students who did not eat zongzi, local officials told them that their families would be punished.
In terms of Beijing’s use of state violence to persecute people for their religious beliefs and culture, this is just the tip of the iceberg.
On Monday, when questioning Council of Indigenous Peoples Minister Icyang Parod in the legislature in Taipei, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chen Chao-ming (陳超明) used an extremely disparaging tone of voice as he mentioned the minister’s name and said that it implied chucao (出草) — the Chinese interpretation of a phrase in many Aboriginal languages that describes a head-hunting tradition.
To openly adopt an attitude dripping of Han chauvinism in the halls of the legislature to ridicule Aborigines is no different from the way the Chinese government treats ethnic minorities in China.
The Republic of China (ROC) government has been in exile in Taiwan for almost 70 years. In addition to the past language policy prohibiting the use of the Hoklo language [commonly known as Taiwanese] and culture — which covers a majority of Taiwanese — the ROC rulers of that period also persecuted Aboriginal culture.
Last year, a three-and-a-half-year prison sentence handed down to Bunun hunter Tama Talum — for possession of a rifle and for killing a wild boar and a Formosan serow in 2013 — was upheld by the Supreme Court, but fortunately, an extraordinary appeal against the sentence is to be filed.
However, for a long time, the dominating values of the Han people and the zhonghua minzu — Chinese nation — have controlled all ethnic groups in Taiwan. Aborigines have been forced to learn Mandarin and take Chinese names, as well as give up their traditional ways of life. This longstanding persecution continues to this day.
As the government is preparing to initiate a procedure of transitional justice for Aborigines, they are being ridiculed by a lawmaker from the opposition KMT in the legislature. The fact that the party that had been in power for many years is oblivious to the past and even tries to block such legislation makes it clear that deep-rooted bad habits continue among ethnic Chinese in Taiwan.
The KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) have long promoted Han chauvinism, ignored the ethnic identity of non-Han ethnic groups, grabbed the land of ethnic minorities and even attempted to wipe out cultures and beliefs to boost the impression of fundamental ethnic unity. The actions of the KMT and the CCP are so similar that they almost seem to be agreed upon.
Hopefully, President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration will promote Taiwan-centered education and avoid being trapped in Chinese ethnic thinking. If it does not, Aborigines will face yet another great calamity.
Lin Yu-lun is deputy secretary-general of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS