One night in August last year, as the Central African Republic was gripped by a conflict between Christian and Muslim groups, UN peacekeeping troops descended on an enclave in search of a suspect. One of the peacekeepers is accused of taking a 12-year-old girl behind a truck and raping her.
“When I cried, he slapped me hard and put his hand over my mouth,” the girl told Amnesty International.
It was hardly the only act of brutality by peacekeepers in the world’s poorest nations. There were 99 allegations of sexual abuse against UN staff last year, a 25 percent increase from 2014, affecting peacekeeping operations in nations such as the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo), Haiti, Ivory Coast, Libya, Mali and Sudan.
Illustration: Mountain people
Vulnerable civilians in armed conflict have long been victims of abusive soldiers. However, 104,000 blue-helmeted troops now deployed are sent by more than a dozen nations to protect people. Their repeated failures are looming over the UN as it chooses a new leader and tarnishing the legacy of UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, who is ending his decade-long tenure amid accusations that he has not taken the issue seriously.
“For 10 years, the secretary-general has been happy to sweep all of these allegations under the carpet, but this ‘out of sight, out of mind’ strategy has broken down before he reached the end of his term,” former UN investigator Peter Gallo said. “The organization’s manifest failure is to properly investigate any form of wrongdoing.”
Ban’s office denies the accusations — the secretary-general was “shocked to the core” by the abuse, UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric said, adding that Ban has moved aggressively. In April, the UN announced an investigation of allegations that peacekeepers from at least three nations had abused more than 100 girls in the Central African Republic, where the World Bank said nearly half the population of about 5 million needs humanitarian aid.
However, damaging accounts keep surfacing, not only of abuse, but of failure to investigate and act. Internal UN documents, leaked by advocacy group, AIDS-Free World, include an episode in 2014 in which French troops were said to have forced four girls to perform obscene acts for a few US dollars.
Last week, Anders Kompass, a senior UN official who had tried to expose earlier sexual abuse of children by French and African troops, resigned in frustration.
Kompass said he was horrified by “the complete impunity for those who have been found to have, in various degrees, abused their authority.”
“This makes it impossible for me to continue working there,” he told IRIN news service.
US Republican Senator Bob Corker, who chairs the US House of Representatives’ Foreign Affairs Committee, called Kompass’ resignation “a damning indictment of the leadership at the United Nations that has failed to end the horrific sexual exploitation and abuse by peacekeepers, and protect those who report wrongdoing.”
Ban’s successor must make fixing the problem a high priority, said Richard Gowan, a fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations.
UN officials have been publicly interviewing more than a dozen potential successors to Ban, with a final selection expected in October. All have said they would work to end the mistreatment.
“There are too many stories of sexual abuse by peacekeepers and too little evidence of operations succeeding,” Gowan said. “The next secretary-general will need a plan both to clean up peacekeeping and give it a greater sense of strategic purpose.”
Peacekeeping dates from the origins of the UN, but has grown enormously. In 1948, the UN sent 50 guards to monitor the Israeli-Arab truce. Now, about 104,000 troops with access to attack helicopters and drones are deployed across Asia, Africa, the Caribbean and the Middle East. They are joined by an additional 16,500 civilian personnel. In the past 25 years, the budget has ballooned 16-fold to US$8.3 billion.
Sexual abuse by UN peacekeepers was first documented in Bosnia and Kosovo in the early 1990s. As the frequency has increased, so has impunity for the perpetrators, partly because responsibility for punishment falls to home nations. The UN can send troops home and document the reasons why, but it cannot impose criminal charges or jail offenders.
“The UN is famous as a place where rapists get away with rape,” Aids-Free World cofounder and director Paula Donovan said.
The latest scandals go back to 2013 when boys at a refugee camp in Bangui said they were ordered to perform oral sex and raped by peacekeepers from France, Chad and Equatorial Guinea. A UN official produced a report that was sent to the human rights office in Geneva as well as to the UN Children’s Emergency Fund. Neither took action.
Beatrice Edwards, executive director of advocacy group Government Accountability Project, said UN staff are reluctant to report sexual abuse for fear of losing their jobs.
Kompass, then-field operations director at the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, ultimately got fed up and leaked the buried report to French diplomats in Geneva, who sent investigators to Bangui.
The UN rewarded Kompass for his efforts by suspending him and starting a disciplinary investigation. Miranda Brown, who worked with Kompass, then passed the report to the US mission. Brown’s contract was not renewed, which she said was retaliation for her actions.
“The real problem is that the UN’s leadership are only accountable to themselves,” said Brown, who has testified at congressional hearings.
An external panel appointed last year by Ban issued a report in December last year that accused some UN officials of obstructing the investigation and focusing on punishing Kompass.
It said the child sexual abuse report went “from desk to desk, inbox to inbox.”
“The end result was a gross institutional failure to respond to the allegations in a meaningful way,” it said. “In the absence of concrete action to address wrongdoing by the very persons sent to protect vulnerable populations, the credibility of the UN and peacekeeping operations are in jeopardy.”
The problem is not getting better on its own, although a few steps have been taken. Ban appointed a special coordinator, Jane Holl Lute, a former deputy secretary of the US Department of Homeland Security. The UN Security Council has also authorized the peacekeeping office to send home troops whose nations fail to hold them accountable.
However, the grinding bureaucracy moves slowly.
“For the UN to be fixed, it requires political will from other countries beyond the US,” said Heritage Foundation researcher Brett Schaefer, who has long been critical of the international organization. “The key is persevering after the spotlight has gone.”
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US