Despite Taiwan’s efforts of to maintain a peaceful and stable relationship across the Taiwan Strait, several events have shown that China is still not a trustworthy “friend,” and that Taiwanese should be cautious when faced with China’s so-called “friendliness.”
Since the launch of her election campaign, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has advocated a friendly relationship with China, while also adhering to the the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) fundamental tenet that Taiwan is a sovereign and independent state.
Tsai has repeatedly said that she would strive to maintain the cross-strait “status quo” and pursue the peaceful and stable development of the cross-strait relationship.
Tsai has avoided doing anything that might make Beijing feel “sensitive.” She used the term “Republic of China” (ROC) instead of Taiwan — probably more than any other DPP leader has, she promised to act within the framework of the Constitution, which critics see as a de facto facsimile of the so-called “1992 consensus” that is so important to China.
In addition, when Minister of Health and Welfare Lin Tzou-yien (林奏延) attended an annual meeting of the World Health Assembly meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, he did not mention “Taiwan,” but used “Chinese Taipei” throughout his speech, a move calculated to avoid offending China, that drew criticism from some Taiwanese lawmakers and members of the public.
However, China is still not satisfied.
Like a willful child, China canceled the performance in China of a Taiwanese children’s choir — seemingly in retaliation for a recitation of the the ROC National Anthem at Tsai’s inauguration ceremony.
However, in some ways, China behaves more like a gangster than an innocent and immature child.
A few days ago, Hong Kong bookseller Lam Wing-kei (林榮基) described to reporters how China had kidnapped him, put him under house arrest and forced him to make a confession on TV.
Lam worked for Hong Kong-based Causeway Bay Books, which sold books that are banned in Mainland China.
Lam said that several of his colleagues who also “disappeared” last year suffered similar fates.
On Friday, Chinese human rights lawyer Gao Zhisheng’s (高智晟) daughter, Grace Geng (耿格) held a news conference in Taipei to promote her father’s memoir, which details his kidnap and torture by Chinese authorities for defending human rights.
At the launch, Geng urged Tsai to save her family and all Chinese people.
These examples indicate how common political persecution is in China, and no matter how Taiwan tries to avoid upsetting China, Beijing still imposes “penalties” — even on a children’s choir — because it is impossible for Taipei to acquiesce to all of its demands.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) often brags about how he created a basis for peaceful relations across the Taiwan Strait during the eight years he was in office, but, apparently, the “peace” that he created was only a mirage. In Beijing’s eyes, there can be no peace across the strait unless Taiwan surrenders and becomes part of “China.”
Well, even that would not be enough for Beijing: Chinese are still being arrested and tortured for not being obedient enough, Tibetans are forced to give up their freedom of religion that Beijing once promised them and Muslim Uighurs in Xinjiang are forced to eat in daylight hours during Ramadan to show their loyalty to Beijing.
When protesting the Presidential Office’s rejection of his application to visit Hong Kong out of national security and personal safety concerns, the former president said that he did not know Hong Kong is such a dangerous place — well, apparently it is.
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would