The success of Elon Musk’s SpaceX industrial ventures has given Europe’s space industry a kick in the pants.
After three flawless landings of the first stage of Space Exploration Technologies Corp’s Falcon 9 rocket on a drone barge in the Atlantic ocean since April, the 44-year-old entrepreneur announced on Tuesday last week that he plans to start reusing rockets as soon as September. In contrast, Europe’s non-reusable competitor, Ariane 6, might be ready only in 2020, while a reusable version, a project for which was unveiled this month, might come even later.
“SpaceX is like a giant wake-up call,” said Jean-Yves Le Gall, head of French space agency the Centre National d’etudes Spatiales (CNES), in an interview.
“Six to nine months ago many in Europe thought Elon Musk was just hot air, even among the big shots in the space industry, but he showed he was able to do it, to potentially reuse rockets one day. He’s clearly shaking things up,” Le Gall said.
More than just European pride is at stake. The space industry represents 38,000 jobs in Europe, most of them in France, according to Aerospace Defense Industries, an industry group.
With the sector at the cusp of a new era of space missions that will broaden the client base for satellites and open the way for exploration projects hitherto unreachable, Europe cannot afford to miss the boat.
A cost-effective Europe-made rocket would allow the continent to remain one of the biggest players in the US$6 billion global market for payload launchers and also be part of major long-term missions, such as a manned trips to Mars. Before Musk’s reusable success began changing the game, the launcher market was estimated to reach US$8.4 billion in 2023, according to Mountain View, California-based market research firm Frost & Sullivan.
MUSK PRESSURE
Under pressure from Musk, the South-Africa born Canadian-American, the industry worldwide, including in China and India, is rethinking its approach to drive down costs. Space-launcher companies, which put satellites, cargo and humans in space, are seeking to bring prices down 50 percent or more.
In April, SpaceX landed the first stage of the Falcon 9 rocket back on a drone barge about 322km off the US Atlantic coast. It has since made two other successful landings, after sending payloads into the upper atmosphere. It is trying again today.
Long considered a brash upstart nipping at the heels of staid aerospace giants, SpaceX is coming of age 14 years after it was founded by Musk with the lofty — and many have said unrealistic — goal of revolutionizing spacecraft and colonizing Mars. SpaceX is now within striking distance of becoming dominant in the payload business. It says it plans to fly 18 missions this year, triple the number last year.
The California-based company said it plans to use a previously-flown Falcon 9 booster stage later this year and cut the flight price further from the current US$61 million it says it charges for commercial payloads.
WAY BEHIND
Arianespace, one of the world’s biggest commercial satellite launchers, which will use the Ariane 6, claims its prices will be close to those of SpaceX.
While the cost of reusable rockets, technical hurdles and market viability have yet to be tested, Le Gall said Musk is well advanced and that Europe must move faster.
On June 1, the CNES and Airbus Safran Launchers — Europe’s largest space company — unveiled an engine project, dubbed “Prometheus,” which is designed to make the future Ariane 6 rocket reusable and send payloads in space for a quarter of the price offered by the current launcher, Ariane 5.
The engine is to be first tested in 2020. The problem for Europe is that while SpaceX is already testing its reusable rockets and slashing prices, a reusable Ariane 6 is just a glimmer in the eyes of scientists.
“What we want is [for it] to stand ready should reusability become a reality,” Le Gall said, pledging to ask European partners for more than the current 100 million euros (US$113 million) the region has so far earmarked for the program.
Being nimble in a fast-moving arena can be a hurdle for the European project, which combines mostly the region’s five biggest economies — Germany, France, the UK, Italy and Spain — industrial groups in these countries, the European Space Agency and the institutions of the EU. Getting these multiple entities to work together in concert remains a challenge.
TORN JEANS
While Ariane 6 in its non-reusable form is likely to be a formidable direct competitor for SpaceX’s Falcon 9, it is still four years away from being ready.
French Minister for Research and Higher Education in charge of space matters Thierry Mandon said he is not worried, dismissing the potential Musk threat.
“At the end of the day, what matters is the cost, however you get there — reusability or something else,” he said in an interview. “We may have lacked vision, or coordination, in Europe, but we don’t know the end of the story yet.”
For Le Gall, Europe’s contemptuous inability to take Musk seriously dates back years. He remembers a conference in Vietnam about a decade ago where the billionaire “showed up in torn jeans and with a plastic bag. He told us — the chiefs of the three biggest rocket launchers worldwide — I am here and your are dead. One of us replied: You talk, we launch. Had we known...”
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US