On Thursday last week, heavy rain caused severe flooding at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport, leading to tens of thousands of stranded passengers bereft of light, electricity and air-conditioning, and not knowing when flights would resume. The central and local government, as well as Taoyuan International Airport Corp (TIAC), were at a loss as to what to do, pointing the finger of blame at each other. It was as if they were hoping that the problem would just go away if they ignored it long enough.
It was not the first time flooding had occurred at Taoyuan airport. It is fine if airport authorities decide to close the airport temporarily as an emergency measure at times of heavy rain to prevent the situation from becoming more serious. It has happened in other countries, too.
Notodden Airport in Norway was recently closed when rains caused flooding on the runway, and affected the connecting highway and bridges: It was closed twice in as many weeks. Then there was Boston Logan International Airport, which had to be closed twice between September last year and April. There is nothing shameful about closing an airport when heavy weather or natural disasters threaten to disrupt services or potentially put lives at risk. That said, there are few cases of international airports shutting down because the drainage system could not cope with a bit of rain — and those occurred in less-developed countries.
Initially, people suspected the culprit was the airport’s inadequate,1980s-designed drainage system. However, a Ministry of Transportation and Communications investigation revealed that the problem was caused by sediment blocking a pipe, causing floodwaters to flow back into the airport. This has nothing to do with the design of the drainage system: It is human error, based on negligence, pure and simple. The ministry accordingly replaced TIAC’s chairman and president, in what was the first step in introducing some much-needed changes.
There are also structural problems. The airport has definitely seen better days and is continuously plagued by leaks, partial flooding and delayed runway maintenance.
Many of these problems have been due to public construction projects long kept on the back burner, budgets perennially promised, but rarely forthcoming, and substandard construction work. Complicating matters is TIAC’s tendency to give out positions as rewards: management is often ill-suited and ill-prepared for the job, and often does not take the task seriously. Inadequate management has only exacerbated the problems at the airport.
Structural and personnel issues aside, there are also issues with the disaster response task force TIAC has set up to deal with natural or manmade disasters, such as typhoons, fires, flooding, dangerous substances, radiation, biological pathogens, earthquakes, tsunamis, hijackings, explosive devices or crashes, in compliance with the Disaster Prevention and Protection Act (災害防救法). This task force has drawn up emergency response procedures for disasters and emergencies of all descriptions and, while this all sounds impressive, the reality is far less so. The task force is not fit for the purpose, there is little disaster response preparedness to speak of and communication with the outside world is wanting. All in all, the airport is unable to cope with disasters or emergencies.
In any crisis there is opportunity. This could be a turning point. The government needs to think carefully about how to reform the personnel issues, re-examine the importance and prioritization of various construction projects, and vet contractors to make sure they are up to snuff. It also needs to ensure that systems and regulations are complied with, and drill emergency response measures to cope with various eventualities. Only when it has ironed out all of these details will the prospects of Taoyuan airport improve.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past