For years, chain-link fences 3.6m high have been a fixture of some of New York’s parks, a reflection of a time when the city was a more dangerous place, erected to protect the children playing inside.
However, now, those fences have become barriers, officials say, dividing a park from its neighbors, so at some parks the high fences are to be knocked down.
On Tuesday, the city announced that eight parks are to undergo ambitious face-lifts that are about more than just rehabilitation — it is a plan that represents an evolution, officials said, in New York’s approach to parks by making these public spaces blend better and be more welcoming to their neighborhoods.
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
City Parks Commissioner Mitchell Silver said that besides lowering or removing fences, the plan also involved installing new benches, greenery and distinctive walkways, as well as treating the sidewalks that border parks as part of the parks themselves.
While the high fences were once seen as a deterrent, Silver said that creating more sight lines along the edges of parks and breathing new life into deserted patches would make them safer.
As part of a citywide plan, US$40 million is to be spent on the eight parks. The parks were chosen in a nomination process that included commentary from neighborhood residents.
Silver said about 690 of New York’s more than 1,700 parks were recommended for an overhaul.
“That’s proof positive of how excited New Yorkers are to increase accessibility and openness in their favorite parks,” he said in a statement.
Those selected were Seward Park on the Lower East Side of Manhattan; Faber Pool and Park on the North Shore of Staten Island; Jackie Robinson Park in northern Manhattan; Van Cortlandt Park and Hugh Grant Circle and Virginia Park in the Bronx; Flushing Meadows-Corona Park in Queens; and Fort Greene and Prospect Parks, both in Brooklyn.
A park’s accessibility to neighborhoods was also a consideration. Overall, city officials have set a long-term goal of having 85 percent of New Yorkers living within walking distance of a park.
In the Parkchester neighborhood in the Bronx, Hugh Grant Circle is not just uninviting, it is also largely off-limits, blocked by a gate that is often locked, said Nilka Martell, a community activist who pressed for the circle to be selected for the city program, called Parks Without Borders.
As she sees it, the park has potential to be a neighborhood hub, used for art installations and community programs and as a complement to a farmer’s market held nearby.
“None of these things would be possible with that fence there,” Martell said. “Lifting the fence creates all these ideas: How can we activate it? How can we use it?”
At Jackie Robinson Park, a narrow strip of parkland that runs from 145th to 155th streets, between Bradhurst and Edgecombe avenues, the fencing around some sections of the park was not a driving concern.
Erin Ratner, a lawyer with three children who has lived across the street from the park for nearly a decade, pointed out the dead branches she worries might snap off the trees, the toilets and water fountains that rarely work and improvements needed on the playgrounds.
“You can tell just from looking that this is not a park that gets a lot of love,” Ratner, 35, said.
Carmel Gayle, 75, has seen her children and now grandchildren enjoy the park during the 43 years she has lived in the area. The park, she said, was already essential to the neighborhood.
“We can’t do without this park,” she said, sitting on a bench with a friend. “Young people, everyone — we need this place.”
On the Lower East Side, Seward Park has long been a respite from the neighborhood’s rush and its human density. It is a 0.5 hectare space, shaded by trees and wedged in a stretch between the Manhattan and Williamsburg Bridges, where children can clamber up jungle gyms and athletes can play basketball.
It is also a place where residents can simply sit in peace and tear off chunks of a kaiser roll to feed to pigeons, just as Rosalind Davis, a retired painter, was doing on a recent weekend afternoon.
“There are so few places to escape from all the congestion,” said Davis, who has been a regular at the park for years. “This is a place away from all the usual hustle and bustle. It just needs a little love and care.”
Seward Park, considered the first municipal playground in the US, has long been a place for recreation and access to greenery for the working-class, and mostly immigrant, families living in the neighborhood.
When it opened, in fall 1903, the New York Times reported that a swarm of about 20,000 eager children “mobbed the gates.”
These days, the neighborhood has changed considerably, but the park still draws a crowd.
Yet, residents say, the park is not reaching its full potential. They point to the fountain that has long been out of service, the play equipment with chipped paint and the few points of entry. The park has two gates, as well as a third that is unlocked when the public library branch in the park is open. Elsewhere along the perimeter, gates are locked or a high fence stands in the way.
“It’s not doing any big harm, but it’s very cold and not inviting,” Davis said. “You never know where you can get in or out of this place.”
Amy Robinson, the president of the Seward Park Conservancy, which was formed almost two years ago, has helped lead the campaign for the park to be considered for Parks Without Borders. She said the objectives of the program aligned with the ambitions of Seward Park’s boosters.
Part of that is access.
“As times have changed, we’ve been able to get one other gate open,” Robinson said, “and there could be six gates open.”
However, she also envisioned a park that was even more connected with its neighbors.
“The more care that is given to the park, the more people respect the park — the more people respect the plantings and what’s in the park,” Robinson said.
And more than that, she added, “the more people use it.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers