Technological innovation offers Africa huge possibilities. That is why I joined Africa’s movers and shakers last week at a meeting of the World Economic Forum in Kigali, the capital of Rwanda. We were there to discuss how the digital economy can propel the kind of radical change the continent needs.
At the same time, though, we had to think about some old tools that our ancestors passed down to us — namely, how to think for the long term and how to work together. These tools are a form of technology that we need to use now, so that future generations have a chance.
Climate change is the ultimate test of whether we can use the old and new technologies to safeguard our children’s future.
Africans must take decisive action to combat the threat of global warming by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and by helping one another to adapt to climate change. If we fail to make progress in these areas now, future generations will judge our inaction as expensive, unjust and immoral.
Africa is one of the regions most vulnerable to climate change. Yet it accounts for only 2.3 percent of global carbon dioxide emissions. That is partly because two-thirds of Africans — 621 million people — do not have access to electricity.
To meet the double challenge of climate change and this energy deficit, African nations need to help themselves and one another. Developed countries — the major contributors to global warming — must live up to the promises they made at the UN Climate Change Conference (COP21) in Paris in December last year.
Alongside reacquainting ourselves with old-tech methods of thinking about the long run and working together, new technology is essential if Africa is to cope with climate change. Innovations in biotechnology and farming methods are needed to deal with disease, pests and drought.
New technology can also help Africa to leapfrog over dependence on fossil fuels and into a low-carbon future. The continent has a great opportunity to develop new low-carbon energy strategies that build resilience and support growth that benefits everyone, reducing poverty faster. We show how this can be done in last year’s Africa Progress Report, Power People Planet: Seizing Africa’s Energy and Climate Opportunities.
Renewable sources will replace fossil fuels gradually. It cannot happen overnight. Africa needs a judicious and dynamic energy mix. Most of all, it needs much more energy, now: Sub-Saharan Africa as a whole, excluding South Africa, currently generates less electricity than Spain.
The state of education in Africa is one telling consequence of the continent’s energy crisis. I have worked in education most of my life, as a teacher and minister of education in Mozambique. Experience has taught me that schools are the key to a nation’s success and prosperity. Yet in many African nations, 80 percent of primary schools do not have electricity, severely compromising the quality of instruction.
Shortages of electricity also cost lives. Almost four in five Africans rely for cooking on solid biomass, mainly wood and charcoal. As a result, more than 600,000 people die each year from household air pollution. Efficient cooking stoves would save them, liberate millions of girls and women from the chore of gathering firewood, and generate wide-ranging environmental benefits.
The steps that Africa’s leaders need to take are clear. Long-term national interest must take precedence over short-term political goals, vested interests and political patronage.
African leaders need to root out graft, make the governance of energy utilities — some of which have been centers of corruption and inefficiency — more transparent, strengthen regulations and increase public spending on energy infrastructure. They also need to redirect the US$21 billion spent in Africa on subsidies for loss-making utilities and electricity consumption — which mainly benefit the rich — toward connection subsidies and renewable-energy investments that deliver energy to the poor.
There is also a clear course of action for the leaders of major carbon dioxide emitting countries. They need to put a proper price on their emissions by taxing them, instead of continuing to subsidize them by spending billions on fossil-fuel exploration. G20 countries must set a timetable for phasing out such subsidies.
Moreover, rich nations need to mobilize international development finance, which can play a key role in helping African countries meet their energy needs. The fragmented, under-resourced and ineffective system for financing climate policy has failed Africa. It needs wholesale reform. Unfortunately, the world’s largest emitters have shown little commitment to the UN’s Green Climate Fund.
Corporate leaders have a responsibility to act as well. They should demand a price on carbon, drive innovation and seek opportunities to fund low-carbon development across Africa. Natural gas and renewable energy sources, such as sun, water and wind, are an opportunity, not a risk, in Africa. Millions of energy-poor, disconnected Africans earning less than US$2.50 a day constitute an energy market worth US$10 billion a year.
Some hope for rapid change might be glimpsed in the fact that Africa now leads the world in adopting many new technologies. It is bypassing earlier ones and jumping straight into the digital age.
East Africa’s M-Pesa system for transferring money via mobile phones is spurring new microfinance services, such as peer-to-peer lending. Commodity exchanges are enabling farmers to access real-time prices.
Let us put those timeless, old-tech skills of farsightedness and collaboration together with new technology. If we do, the current generation of African leaders has a unique opportunity to protect future generations from a climate disaster, deliver on the promise of energy for all and build shared prosperity.
Graca Machel is founder of the Graca Machel Trust and a member of The Elders, a group of independent global leaders working together for peace and human rights.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers