After Taipei MRT killer Cheng Chieh (鄭捷) was executed on Tuesday last week, several counselors came forward to speak about their experience of counseling Cheng.
One of them kept saying Cheng was a dreadful man and the kind of death-row prisoner who make her want to bring a personal safety alarm with her on visits, because he was so dreadful and his words and actions showed that he did not even recognize that he had made mistakes.
Another counselor — from a religious background — took on the role of fortune teller, claiming the ability to know a person’s character from their handwriting.
“Cheng’s signature was big and scratchy, which not only shows his egocentricity, but also that his ability to write had deteriorated due to his long-term overindulgence in the cyberworld,” he said.
It is unlikely that either of them are counselors or coaches with professional training in the appropriate fields.
However, the statements they made could confuse the public into believing that they provide professional counseling and coaching.
The fact of the matter is, by posting these comments on Facebook and divulging their patient’s secrets to reporters, they have made the biggest mistake in their purported profession, the goal of which is to offer help to people: They violated confidentiality.
Irrespective of the mistakes a client might have made, everything discussed in counseling sessions should remain confidential. This fundamental principle is supposed to be upheld by psychologists, volunteers, counselors and others in the field.
Even semi-professional counselors and volunteers at Teacher Chang Foundation or Taiwan Lifeline International have to adhere to this principle, because when clients are willing to confide their deepest secrets in their counselors, it means that they trust tem, and if the counselor violates professional ethics and breach confidentiality, it becomes be very difficult to establish trusting relationships between counselors and clients.
This remains true even if with a client on death row such as Cheng, because if such a key professional tenet is disregarded so openly, the public might become fearful of, or antagonistic toward the profession, which is why it is essential for counseling-related groups to establish clear guidelines for everyone involved.
When patients are willing to trust their counselors, share their inner world and describing things they have never told anyone else, this trust is as much a privilege as a burden, especially when painful, dark and heart-rending experiences are uncovered during sessions.
This type of work is extremely challenging for counselors, who must come to terms with their own inner struggles and manage their own emotions. However, they can seek professional assistance to deal with any problems that arise. This is especially common when they are counseling perpetrators of violence.
To be clear, confidentiality is the basic responsibility of counselors at any level. Only by erecting this safety net can counselors be ready to deal with the issues of their patients. Only by doing so can there be any hope for real changes of behavior.
This principle holds true regardless of who the recipients of counseling are and what crimes they have committed. There are certainly exceptions to this rule — when, for example, a client clearly states that they intend to commit suicide, murder, an act of domestic violence or sexual assault. Details on the exceptions can be found in the Taiwan Institute of Guidance and Counseling consultative professional code of ethics.
The confidentiality principle is so deep-seated that certified psychologists, social workers and school counselors would never make these kind of mistakes.
The Psychologists’ Act (心理師法), Social Worker Act (社會工作師法) and Student Guidance and Counseling Act (學生輔導法) all stipulate unambiguous regulations on confidentiality. Violations can result in penalties.
However, there is no law regulating semi-professional counselors. So mistakes can only be avoided by self-reflection, moral discipline and professional development. Sometimes, the law alone is not enough. Prisons and other judicial agencies should develop mechanisms to manage and help semi-professionals — such as counselors and volunteer coaches — to improve their ethical behavior.
It must be sincerely hoped that no counselors again abuse the privileges granted by their patients as a means to obtain media attention, raise their self esteem and increase their sense of achievement or satisfy any other personal interests.
Wang Ta-wei is an Assistant Professor of Educational Psychology at National Pingtung University.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers