Okinotori, an atoll isolated in the Pacific Ocean — a place where not even a bird would be able to survive — has become a bone of contention.
Why is Okinotori so important? In addition to natural resources, such as fisheries and mineral deposits in its surrounding waters, both Chinese and Japanese commentators say that Okinotori would be a crucial battlefield for the Chinese military to prevent US from shipping reinforcements to Asia, including Taiwan and Japan, and it is also a strategic position for China to gain dominance in the Pacific by dispatching its nuclear submarines and warships.
Japan said that in documents it submitted to the UN secretariat in 1997, it claims the area within 200 nautical miles (370km) of its islands as its exclusive economic zone (EEZ), and that Okinotori is one of those such islands. Japan met with no protests from any nation at that time.
However, Taiwanese fishing vessels continued to operate there and China began protesting against the Japanese claim over Okinotori in 2004 — after Japan forcibly expelled Chinese research vessels for interfering with its operations — on the grounds that Okinotori is an atoll and therefore is ineligible for an EEZ claim. The two countries have had frequent conflicts over Chinese research operations in that region that continue to this day.
This puts Taiwan in an awkward position. Japan’s expulsion of Chinese boats is strategically beneficial to Taiwanese interests. Moreover, this is important to the US-Japan military strategy and resistance to China. On the other hand, if Taiwan acknowledges Japan’s EEZ claim, it would lose fishing rights. It is difficult to strike a balance between the advantages and the disadvantages.
Since an incident in 2005 when a Taiwanese fishing boat was seized by Japan near Okinotori, it has become customary for Japanese patrol boats to notify Taiwanese vessels ahead of their arrival so that Taiwanese boats can depart, albeit temporarily, and after Japanese patrol boats leave, the fishing boats return to resume operations.
This shows that Taiwan does not recognize Japan’s claim to the EEZ surrounding Okinotori, but does not directly deny it either to avoid taking the same stance as China, while also maintaining that Okinotori is a controversial region.
With this practice in place, Japan could chase off Chinese research vessels, while Taiwanese boats could continue their operations. Over the past 10 years since this practice was adopted, only one incident has occurred.
When Taiwanese fishing boat Tung Sheng Chi No. 16 was detained by Japan, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement on April 26, saying: “Our government recognizes the disputes over Okinotori and is of the opinion that all parties involved should negotiate in accordance with international law or ask relevant international organizations to help resolve this matter peacefully.”
“Concerning the legal status of Okinotori, Japan should respect the rights of our nation and others to navigate and fish near Okinotori before the UN’s Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf completes its investigation and declares its findings,” it added.
The government was applying the previous formula of no recognition, no acceptance and no direct repudiation. When the first national security meeting was held the same day, the same line was followed.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said: “Whether Japan can claim a 200-mile EEZ off its Okinotori atoll remains extremely controversial in the global community.”
Simply put, whether Okinotori is an island or an atoll is still debatable. Before this question is answered, Taiwan can still fish there, as it has done over the past decade.
However, when the second national security meeting was held the next day, the government altered its stance.
Ma said that “Japan’s Okinotori is an atoll, not an island.”
He single-handedly decided that Okinotori was an atoll.
As if that was not enough, at the same meeting he said that Taiwan opposes “Japan’s illegal expansion. Its unilateral definition of Okinotori atoll as an island violates Article 121 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Our government does not recognize illegal expansion and claims.”
Moreover, the Ma administration took immediate measures saying that Okinotori is an atoll, not an island. Government agencies at all levels will have to call it “Okinotori atoll” and not “Okinotori Island” from now on.
What a dramatic change of stance in a day’s time. Afterward, the ministry issued a news release on the matter. Minister of Foreign Affairs David Lin (林永樂) summoned Japan’s representative to Taiwan to protest Japan’s seizure of the fishing boat, which was followed by another news release. It was as if nothing else was important for the entire week and all of the nation’s energy and time should be spent on stressing that Okinotori is an “atoll,” not an “island.”
Ma has completely abandoned the established rapport with Japan and adopts rhetoric and a stance identical to China’s, leaving no room for compromise with Japan over Okinotori.
What good can come of such hostility and warlike actions? What kind of protection will the fishermen have?
What a shame.
Chiang Huang-chih is a professor of law at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers