China’s attempts at unification
The impact of a worldwide epidemic is far more terrifying than any financial crisis. Yet China dares use the World Health Assembly (WHA) invitation to pull the “one China” trick.
Taiwan has its own public health and border quarantine system that is completely independent of China’s response system. It is an autonomous, individual health entity.
Taiwan withdrew from the WHO in 1971, after it was kicked out of the UN.
However, epidemics are not constrained by state borders and incoming Cabinet spokesperson Tung Chen-yuan (童振源) was right when he said that “participation in the WHO is not only about Taiwanese right to health; Taiwan’s medical contributions to the international community are also an essential link in the global health and disease prevention system.”
Taiwan is a model student in the international community. Despite that, its position is worrying. When SARS broke out in China in November 2002, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) treated epidemic information and numbers as a state secret that were kept confidential for four months. Within a few months, SARS spread to Taiwan, and although it reported the cases to the WHO, it did not receive prevention and treatment assistance due to the interference of “one China” related rules, which resulted in the epidemic spinning out of control. In Taiwan, 346 people fell ill and 73 died.
In May 2003, the international community finally discussed the situation in Geneva, and nine friendly members of the WHA submitted a request that Taiwan be given observer status, with the US explicitly saying it would welcome Taiwan’s participation in the WHO.
Chinese representative to the WHA Wu Yi (吳儀) refused and then-Chinese ambassador to the UN in Geneva Sha Zukang (沙祖康) asked rhetorically: “Who cares about you?”
To this day, these four words remain a grave insult to Taiwanese.
China, you are stupid. You smirk at peace and repeatedly use hatred to fuel your push for unification. This then becomes the fuel for Taiwanese determination to obtain de jure independence.
At a time when nations rely on autonomy, reason and collective agreement to address disaster, China alone behaves like an occupier, making it one of the sources of the disasters facing mankind today.
Chiu Yen-yu
Kaohsiung
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers