Apple Inc last month ran an Apps for Earth promotion, a fundraiser for the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) to mark this year’s Earth Day. The company has announced that the proceeds from 27 apps — including popular titles like Angry Birds II, Cooking Dash 2016 and Candy Crush Soda Saga — between Saturday next week and April 24 will go to the WWF, a global conservation organization.
The cross-sector partnership between Apple and the the WWF illustrates a new technological frontier for raising environmental awareness and influencing conservation practices.
Four technological forces — mobile, social, cloud and big data — have emerged as “game changers” in the way environmental science, policymaking, consumer culture and democracy have developed.
Apps, such as Earth, give the campaigners the opportunity to engage worldwide, tech-savvy, middle-class customers and reach new financial sources.
However, billions of people around the world still live in poverty and lack essential technology for their basic needs.
Digital technologies can be environmentally unsustainable. Much technology, including smartphones, are designed to be thrown away at the first sign of trouble rather than be repaired. The volume of global electronic waste increases by a third every two years. The ugly truth is that developed economies dump most of their harmful and toxic e-waste illegally in developing nations — one in three containers from the EU contains illegal waste under false pretenses.
Moreover, the increasing scarcity of metal and mineral raw materials, the huge and irrecoverable environmental damage, and widespread bloodshed and use of child workers — also mainly in developing nations — do not prevent the development of the next “must-have” digital device. Technology can have deep geopolitical and social bias in favor of elites and to the detriment of poor people.
On Sept. 25 last year, the UN adopted 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to end poverty, protect the environment and ensure prosperity for all. Following the Millennium Development Goals, SDGs are to define global development targets and goals for the next 15 years.
The UN has recognized that technology and development are indistinguishably connected. The implementation of the SDGs has to be guided by the principle of technology justice. Therefore, two new policy mechanisms — the UN Technology Bank and the Technology Facilitation Mechanism — have been proposed to assist the least developed countries to address technology injustices.
The system requires a greater role for states to harness investment in clean and environmentally sound technologies and to ensure that technologies do not exacerbate the vulnerabilities of poor people.
On the first Earth Day in 1970, about 2 million people marched down New York’s Fifth Avenue to express a new environmental paradigm for change and call for a healthy lifestyle for all — not just for the relatively small wealthy population.
Earth Day needs to be a day for demonstration of unity and ecological sustainability.
Lawyers might approach the issue by reconsidering international treaties that govern intellectual property rights, such as Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, an international agreement administrated by the WTO — of which Taiwan is a signatory — to rebalance in favor of the least developed countries and sustainable development agendas.
Yang Chung-han is a doctoral candidate at the University of Cambridge and a member of the Taipei Bar Association.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past