On April 15, the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) legislative caucus finalized its draft version of supervisory regulations for cross-strait agreements. Once the mandatory redrafting period has expired, the draft bill is to be passed to the legislature’s Home Affairs Committee for review, which is very likely to happen on Wednesday or Thursday. However, it would be advisable for the committee to hold off on the review until after the DPP government takes office on May 20.
Although there is a difference of only 20 days, from the perspective of democratic, responsible government, the difference is significant.
There are six versions of the draft act currently awaiting review. These are versions submitted by the DPP, the People First Party, the New Power Party, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), civic groups and one drafted by the Cabinet, the only one that would become completely illegitimate after the May 20 transfer of government.
The Cabinet’s version was drawn up during former premier Jiang Yi-huah’s (江宜樺) term. During the 2014 Sunflower movement protests against President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) cross-strait service trade agreement with China, Jiang’s Cabinet cooked up a “four-stage external communication and consultation mechanism” and a “national security review mechanism” to provide an excuse to rebuff the movement’s key demand for a legally regulated supervisory mechanism to vet future agreements between Taiwan and China. However, on March 24 that year, student activists occupied the Executive Yuan in order to block the ratification of the trade pact.
It was only after the March 30 protest, when more than half a million people marched in front of the Presidential Office Building, that Ma softened his stance against a legally regulated supervisory mechanism for cross-strait agreements.
Four days later, on April 3, the Cabinet passed a draft bill, although it was essentially a re-hash of the previously-announced “four-stage external communication and consultation mechanism” and the “national security review mechanism.” The purpose of the bill was not to enable genuine legislative oversight, but to do the absolute minimum to satisfy the movement’s demands.
Having voted for a new legislature and a change of government, the public cannot accept the existing cross-strait supervisory regulations, which are a product of Jiang’s arrogance and Ma’s negligence. Therefore, the nation should wait until after May 20 so that premier-designate Lin Chuan (林全) can rescind Jiang’s bill and restart the review process.
In addition, the Home Affairs Committee’s review process begins with an explanation of the proposal and consultation with the regulating authority. If the committee’s review of the supervisory regulations goes ahead this week, it would mean that Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) Minister Andrew Hsia (夏立言) — who will only be in office a few more weeks — would be providing explanations of the Cabinet version of the bill that is about to be rendered illegitimate and unrepresentative.
He would also provide opinions on the other versions, from the viewpoint of the council. Hsia’s opinions can in no way be a substitute for the views of incoming MAC minister Katharine Chang (張小月), who is the one who will be in charge of the law’s enforcement.
Chang should be questioned over how the council is to handle the issues of legislative oversight, public participation, transparency and upholding human rights under the different versions of the bill.
Hopefully the DPP will display a higher degree of democratic accountability than the KMT.
Lai Chung-chiang is convener of the Economic Democracy Union.
Translated by Edward Jones
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers