The signing of the Paris Agreement in New York yesterday was a historic event and an important step toward implementing the world’s first global climate deal.
A record number of countries attended: The whole world is committed to turning the promises we made in Paris into concrete action. The Paris spirit is alive and well — and moving forward.
In past years we have listened to so many gloomy predictions that a universal agreement would be impossible to achieve. Indeed, there were strong reasons for being skeptical. However, our faith in diplomacy and multilateral cooperation has paid off.
And we must say out loud that Europe has played a crucial role in creating consensus around a 195 countries-strong deal.
In the run up to the Paris climate conference, the EU mobilized its network of 3,000 delegations and member state embassies across the globe.
This dialogue with our partner countries, the general public, the business community and civil society organizations has helped us build a global coalition to fight climate change. This is European diplomacy at its very best: working together for the good of Europe and the whole world.
During the conference, Europe was a strong voice for ambition. Our climate diplomacy set up a network of alliances with the group of 79 African, Caribbean and Pacific states. We engaged with both big players and smaller developing countries to aim for the highest level of ambition. This now famous “high ambition coalition” was the game changer in Paris.
And our work goes on. Paris was just the beginning. Building on the successful alliances we made in the run up to and during Paris would be crucial: We will need each other’s help to keep on track toward a global clean energy transition. That is the only way to limit global warming to well below 2oC.
Global temperatures have reached record levels. The impact of climate change continues to threaten lives and destabilize entire regions. Collective action worldwide is more vital than ever.
Desertification and drought foster mass movements of people, spread epidemics and create conflicts for the control of resources. Climate change is already a foreign policy issue: it affects our security right now, not in a distant future.
Tackling this global threat must continue to be at the heart of the European external action — all 28 EU foreign ministers have agreed on that. Addressing the direct and indirect security effects of climate change would be an important part of the new EU global strategy on foreign and security policy to be presented to the European Council in June.
It is a complex threat, but we already have many of the tools we need to address climate fragility and limit risks to peace.
Our partners in the G7 are also working hard to identify concrete areas for action. And yet our strategies on climate change, development, humanitarian aid and peace building issues need to be more strongly integrated. All our policies must keep an eye on climate change issues.
When time is short and financial resources are limited, we cannot afford duplications and inconsistencies. National climate adaptation programs could identify and promote the co-benefits and synergies with other areas, such as economic and social development, health, environment, and also peace.
Our priority now is to go for an early ratification and entry into force of the Paris Agreement. This would send an important signal to the world: European governments are serious about climate change and we will put into practice what was agreed on paper.
For the same reason we cannot lose any time in bringing into play the climate action plans we prepared in advance of Paris. We will support our partners across the world as they prepare for implementation and we will keep engaging with non-state actors such as businesses, cities and many others.
It is time to get down to the hard work of delivering on the Paris Agreements’s promises. We will need the same ambition and shared sense of direction which brought about the deal. The EU will keep leading the way — as it has always done — towards a greener planet.
Federica Mogherini is High Representative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. Miguel Arias Canete is European Commissioner for Climate Action and Energy.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US