The conflict between the Taipei City Government and Farglory Group over the Taipei Dome project has turned ugly, with the city planning to dissolve the contract, and Farglory asking for NT$37 billion (US$1.15 billion) in damages for breach of contract. City councilors do not want Taipei residents to foot the bill and the end result might yet be another failed build-operate-transfer (BOT) project.
The main premise for a successful BOT project is that both the government and the contractor agree to abide by the law and the spirit of the contract. The contractor must follow the contract and the government must keep strict tabs on progress to protect the public interest. All proceedings must be transparent and there must be no room for any underhanded dealings.
However, the Taipei Dome project ground to a halt due to several critical flaws that have become all too common with BOT deals in Taiwan: neither the contractor nor the city government respected the original contract. Once the tender process is completed and a contractor has been selected, there are often a series of negotiations and closed-door meetings aimed at amending the contract — which runs counter to the spirit of the BOT ideal.
Farglory came up with different reasons why the Dome contract should be amended, such as the distribution of the space and the structure’s volume. The contract details were changed repeatedly, with the administrations of former Taipei mayors Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) caving in to Farglory’s changes each time.
Because neither contractors nor governments, local or central, appear to respect contracts, instead preferring to resolve problems that arise behind closed doors, the history of BOT projects in Taiwan is one of flaws that governments can use to settle accounts with their predecessors.
However, the lack of understanding of how BOT projects work leaves a lot of room for criticism and political attacks. When a new administration uses a BOT project as a bat to attack its predecessor, the infighting can become very intense. A good example of this is Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who, since taking office, has focused on five projects that he said involve major irregularities, including the Dome.
Ko’s administration suspended construction of the Dome, leaving a skeleton of a building in the middle of the city. The problem is that the city government’s tough stance prevents it from taking a step back, even though it is unclear how it should proceed.
Even if another contractor was willing to take over the Dome project, whether they would be willing to take on the immense media and public scrutiny that would entail is a big question. That leaves the question of how this mess should be dealt with.
The Ko administration and Farglory are certain to settle their dispute in court. Less easy to resolve is the unfinished structure itself. Leaving it unfinished puts the surrounding area, the city and the public at risk. If an earthquake or a typhoon struck and the structure collapsed or parts of it broke off, who would assume liability?
BOT projects are common worldwide, so it is hard to understand why they have become so problematic in Taiwan. If responsibility for the Taipei Dome cannot be corrected in accordance with the law, future BOT projects are likely to be equally disastrous.
The government must insist on maintaining its original contract requirements after a bid has been awarded. It would be better to dissolve a contract than to give in to a contractor’s demands.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past