According to media reports, Taiwanese last year spent NT$2 billion (US$61.1 million) on medication to treat colds and consumed 68.34 million pills, 46 tonnes of powdered medication and 300,000 liters of liquid medication.
To avoid the misuse of national health insurance resources, the National Health Insurance (NHI) Administration and the medical sector should advocate correct health education and promote the concept of self-care rather than tell people that they should go see a doctor if they suffer cold symptoms.
The main direction for healthcare policies in most nations has always been that prevention is better than cure, that people can treat minor symptoms themselves and that national health insurance resources should not be spent on self-healing disorders.
HEALTH EDUCATION
The health services in most nations, such as the UK’s National Health Service, provide health education through government or family physicians, so that people can learn how to treat colds by themselves and when they should see a doctor.
What the public really needs are doctors that are careful and meticulous in their health education.
That is why the medical sector and the government should provide adequate health education, such as teaching people how to assess a cold, which colds can be treated by drinking more water and resting, which should be observed and which require a visit to the doctor.
PRESCRIPTIONS
Administration statistics show that, on average, Taiwanese visit doctors more than 20 times per year, that NT$21.5 billion of NHI resources are spent on acute upper respiratory tract infections every year and that the percentage of visits to clinics that result in drug prescriptions is much higher than in advanced nations.
In addition, 14.5 of every 100 patients that visit a health center do so for light ailments, such as a cold, that could be treated using self-care measures.
That people purchase prescription-free cold medication also highlights several problems.
First, it shows that current registration fees for a visit to a doctor are too high and that it is much cheaper to buy cold medication over the counter. Doing so also avoids having to wait and is therefore seen as more cost-effective.
HEALTH RISKS
Second, although prescription-free drugs might be effective, and faster to obtain, there is a risk of people purchasing drugs that pose a health risk to them.
That is why improving self-care education is a key element of healthcare reform.
The Taiwan Healthcare Reform Foundation recommends a prompt implementation of Article 44 of the National Health Insurance Act (全民健康保險法) — which states that “the benefits of the family physicians system should be paid out on a per person basis” — and the establishment of a health education and consultation team that can win the public’s trust.
It also recommends the addition of warning labels to the outer packaging of drugs and user instructions to be placed inside the packaging that meet international standards.
This would improve the safety of self-care and a mechanism that ensures safe drug use, while also raising public health knowledge and awareness, and saving NHI resources.
Liu Mei-chun is a board member of the Taiwan Healthcare Reform Foundation. Ku Chih-fen is a researcher at the foundation.
Translated by Perry Svensson
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS