Two birds, one stone
There is a lot of debate regarding fighting to maintain relations with Taiwan’s 22 diplomatic allies. Some have said the relationships are not useful and that Taiwan should concentrate on strengthening ties with “important” nations like the US and Japan. Even though losing all of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies would not affect the economy or military security, something would be lost.
Diplomatic relations are a symbol of sovereignty and independence, and links with allies contribute to relations with so-called “important counties,” provide the nation with channels to international organizations, and increase potentially mutually beneficial political, economic and social relations. Taiwan, as a responsible member of the international community, has a duty to contribute to international welfare and by using its resources to preferentially help its diplomatic allies, Taiwan can kill two birds with one stone.
Showing that Taiwan cares for its diplomatic allies by acts of goodwill should not be a burden on the economy. There must be some mutually beneficial projects that could be undertaken without cost, we just need to devote more effort to exploring our options.
Painting the relations of Taiwan with its diplomatic allies as a “selling of ties” is counterproductive and untrue. Interests play an important role in relations, personal and international, but they are not always just about “giving money.” Diplomatic relations should be first about appreciation, and second about being proactive and using each other for maximum mutual benefits.
Taiwan, in comparison with China, is not a big or important nation. If it “despises” ties with “small” nations, it is shooting itself in the foot. How can Taiwan then ask from other nations what it is not prepared to do itself? Taiwan cannot allow itself to lose the moral high ground.
Right now Taiwan needs to adopt a more proactive foreign policy, less reactive to Beijing’s moves, and launch a campaign to convince nations of the advantages of maintaining diplomatic ties with Taiwan.
Taiwan needs to concentrate on its diplomatic ties; look at the nation and not treat them as a tool in a diplomatic tug-of-war with China. By assisting allies using “software” (transferring know-how, education, experiences, technology, etc.) over “hardware” (money and goods), Taiwan could have a positive effect helping its allies, and by helping allies explore new avenues, Taiwan could make its relationships more meaningful.
Let us explore and use these relations and make them more relevant to Taiwan and its diplomatic allies.
Francisco Luis Perez
Taipei
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers