Addressing the issue of independence for Hong Kong, Li Ka-shing (李嘉誠), Hong Kong’s wealthiest man, said that independence is something that Hong Kongers would never seek and that Hong Kong does not have what is required to become an independent state.
Qiao Xiaoyang (喬曉陽), chairman of the law committee of the National People’s Congress — the organ overseeing the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China — immediately said that it is impossible for Hong Kong to become a sovereign, independent country.
However, Hong Kong was taken over by China as early as 1972, rather than at the handover from the UK to China on July 1, 1997, and if Hong Kong wants independence, all it has to do is turn to the UN.
The UN Charter, which was adopted in 1945, affirms the principle of self-determination for non-self-governing territories, and at the first session of the UN General Assembly on Dec. 14, 1946, the assembly passed Resolution 66, Transmission of Information Under Article 73e of the Charter, which designated 74 territories as non-self-governing territories. One of those territories was Hong Kong, and some of the others were Alaska, Hawaii, Guam, Puerto Rico, Malaysia and Singapore.
On Dec. 14, 1960, the General Assembly passed Resolution 1514, Declaration On the Granting of Independence To Colonial Countries and Peoples.
The resolution demanded that the General Assembly’s Special Committee propose ways in which colonial territories could be made self-governing and independent as soon as possible.
However, at the time, Hong Kong suffered from the misconception that the “status quo” would remain unchanged — much like the situation in Taiwan today — and this attitude only served to give China ample time to prepare for its annexation.
On Nov. 2, 1972, China’s long-term effort to buy up UN officials finally paid off, and at the same time as UN Resolution 2908, Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples, was passed, the General Assembly also decided that Hong Kong was a “Chinese territory,” rather than a British one, following a recommendation by the Special Committee.
Britain did not file a protest against this decision until on Dec. 14 that year, when it said that “the action of the General Assembly in no way affected the legal status of Hong Kong.”
The protest was supported only by Fiji, Sweden and Venezuela.
In September 1982, then-British prime minister Margaret Thatcher met with then-Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) in Beijing, over what remaining value Hong Kong could continue to hold for the UK following a decision that it should be returned to China.
While it is true that this cruel story is all about Hong Kong, it should nevertheless be a constant warning bell in the back of Taiwanese minds.
Sim Kiantek is a former associate professor in the Department of Business Administration at National Chung Hsing University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers