A car radiator repair boss, a long-time soldier and an economics professor — they are unlikely bedfellows leading the charge of an anti-immigration party that has come from nowhere to disrupt the cozy, stable world of German coalition government.
Andre Poggenburg, Uwe Junge and Joerg Meuthen steered the Alternative for Germany (AfD) to big gains in three regional elections on Sunday last week, as voters disenchanted with German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s liberal immigration policy turned to them in droves.
It was partly a measure of success of the three-year-old party’s strategy of offering leaders from diverse walks of life to woo voters across the social spectrum.
Poggenburg — who won in a poor eastern state — saw himself as championing the “non-academic,” for example, while Meuthen delighted in debating the finer points of the German constitution in the richer west.
About three-quarters of Germans now expect the right-wing party to win its first seats in the national parliament in a general election next year, a survey by YouGov showed on Friday last week.
The rise of the AfD followed gains by other European anti-immigration parties, including France’s National Front, and has punctured the centrist consensus around which the mainstream parties have formed alliances in Germany. It added pressure on Merkel to find a solution to Europe’s refugee crisis.
However, immigration was not even on Poggenburg’s mind when he joined the party in 2013.
He has said his main concern was that a distant elite in Berlin was deciding on bailouts for crisis-stricken eurozone states over ordinary Germans’ heads.
Now the AfD leader in the eastern state of Saxony-Anhalt feels the same about the refugee crisis and is angry the government has let in so many refugees — more than 1 million arrived last year — without consulting German citizens.
“The borders were flung open and now everyone is being forced to pay the price socially and financially, while suffering from a loss of domestic security,” said the 41-year-old, who grew up in the former communist East Germany, and runs a business repairing car radiators and heat exchangers.
“Everyone is now expected to stump up for a decision they didn’t even make,” he added.
Poggenburg secured a record 24.2 percent of the vote for the party in Saxony-Anhalt, making it the second-biggest force there behind Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union.
He plans later this month to close his company after about two decades and devote himself to politics fulltime.
Poggenburg said he could never have imagined working for a political party a few years back because there was not one where he felt at home.
However, in the run-up to the 2013 federal election, the AfD, which campaigned against the euro and bailouts, caught his eye.
Poggenburg has said he sees himself as representing the party’s patriotic, non-academic and self-employed members.
The party’s support was stronger in Saxony-Anhalt, where unemployment is at 9.8 percent, than in the richer western states of Baden-Wuerttemberg and Rhineland-Palatinate.
“If someone says we’ve got high unemployment and we couldn’t invest here or there ... and then all of a sudden there’s enough money to finance a multicultural experiment, of course people will say: ‘We’ve had enough, it can’t go on like this and we want a party that tackles this problem,’” Poggenburg said.
His story is rather different to that of 58-year-old Junge, the AfD’s frontman in the western state of Rhineland-Palatinate, where the party got 12.6 percent of the vote.
A lieutenant colonel who served in Afghanistan twice, Junge was born in western Germany near the end of World War II, his parents and grandparents fled their homes in an area that then-belonged to Germany, but is now part of Poland, as Russian troops advanced.
His grandparents often told him stories of relatives being killed or injured and they never got over leaving their property behind, so he says he grew up with their “trauma of death, wounds and the loss of home.”
A CDU member for 34 years until 2009, who says his role model is former West German chancellor Helmut Schmidt, Junge told reporters he was concerned that refugees would push up German unemployment and weaken the healthcare system.
Some other party leaders, particularly in the east, have prompted public outrage with their comments on the refugee crisis.
Alexander Gauland, a trained lawyer with a penchant for tweed jackets who leads the AfD in Brandenburg, has compared refugees to the barbarians who invaded the Roman Empire and said Germany should not be “blackmailed by children’s eyes.”
Bjoern Hoecke, a teacher who is the AfD’s leader in the eastern state of Thuringia, said evolution had given Europe and Africa two different “reproduction strategies,” with the African one “aiming for the highest possible growth rate.”
Political scientist Hajo Funke, an expert on the far-right wing, said the AfD contains radical right-wing members, as well as people who did not see themselves that way.
“That’s why the AfD is playing it both ways — showing ‘we’re moderate’ and ‘we’re not’ — so it has attracted two groups: People protesting as they’re unhappy with government policy, especially on refugees, and others who get incited to unleash their resentment,” Funke said.
For Germans who find the likes of Gauland and Hoecke too extreme, more moderate voices have been presented.
Chief among them is Meuthen, a 54-year-old bespectacled economics professor and a twice-married father-of-five, who is Catholic and goes to church when he can.
A polished speaker, Meuthen responded with aplomb to questions on the details of Germany’s constitution at a recent rally in Baden-Wuerttemberg, a wealthy southwestern state that is home to luxury automakers Daimler and Porsche, and where the AfD won 15.1 percent of the vote.
A regional government economics specialist turned university professor, he closely watched the eurozone crisis unfold and thought the rescue packages breached the EU’s no-bailout clause.
Meuthen decided to join a party for the first time after watching the AfD’s founder — also an economics professor — on television on the evening of the party’s debut, and failed, federal election campaign in 2013.
He has since become the AfD’s little-known joint chairman, overshadowed by his colleague, Frauke Petry, who has suggested refugees entering Germany illegally should be shot if necessary.
It is difficult to imagine Meuthen saying such a thing.
When he told reporters about the need to deport economic migrants, he stressed that deportation was “not a nice process.”
“The people who are all coming to our country now are only doing what we would do in their situation, so we mustn’t blame them,” Meuthen said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers