The Executive Yuan’s publication of information about areas susceptible to soil liquefaction has come as a bombshell for Taiwan’s usually quiet society. The revelations have thrown a lot of people into a state of worry and confusion.
Cabinet spokesperson Sun Lih-chyun (孫立群) said that there is no reason to panic, as the government has drawn up a full set of complementary measures.
However, the online database and a telephone hotline have been overloaded with inquiries, showing just how anxious people are.
Why were the authorities in such a rush to release the data, which are important enough to have an impact on social stability, at this key moment when the outgoing government is preparing to transfer power to an incoming one and social stability should be a priority? It really has been done in too much of a rush.
The Executive Yuan said that the data on soil liquefaction is only “preliminary.” Although the data are very rough, consisting of maps with simply defined “red areas,” they have been enough to throw the public into turmoil, while the real-estate, mortgage and insurance markets have been unsettled. The atmosphere of anxiety is undoubtedly making things worse for Taiwan’s stagnant economy.
The Executive Yuan said that the government has a complete set of complementary measures already in place, but the measures all require the cooperation of the legislature and local governments. At present, just as government authority is being handed over and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) “blue sky” is giving way to the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) “green earth,” to what extent is this caretaker Cabinet actually capable of implementing the measures? Everyone knows the answer to that question.
A caretaker Cabinet should focus on maintaining stability. It should be obvious to anyone that releasing such crucial data that involves complementary measures would stir up trouble.
Has the transitional Cabinet not overstepped its remit by making such a move?
The Executive Yuan is trying to put out the flames by offering policy benefits.
It said that the government is to contribute NT$24 billion (US$738 million) over the next six years to pay for “health checks” for old buildings and to fund measures to prevent or reduce soil liquefaction.
However, the announcement also goes beyond the role of a caretaker Cabinet.
Common sense tells that announcing which areas are susceptible to soil liquefaction was bound to have a tremendous negative impact on social stability, as well as on business growth and economic activity.
Did the Executive Yuan instruct the National Development Council to carry out a regulatory impact analysis beforehand, or to propose risk mitigation countermeasures to deal with the negative consequences that it might have? Evidently not. The complementary measures that people are hearing about are media versions of the “official line.”
What needs to be done next? Local governments have no idea, and the public has even less of a clue.
According to Construction and Planning Agency figures, more than 3.68 million households in Taiwan live in buildings that are more than 30 years old. These older buildings are mainly concentrated in the six special municipalities, with at least 450,000 such households in Taipei. What is to be done with these older buildings? Surely that is the most urgent question.
However, while the central government is trumpeting its policies, local governments have not even drawn up budgets to deal with the issue and potential contractors are even less prepared to handle it.
People can only hope that the incoming government would quickly pick up the reins and deal with the issue, rather than just putting it off and hoping for the best.
Ted Chiou is a professor in the Department of Social and Policy Sciences at Yuan Ze University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.