Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) is used to his old position as legislative speaker — a position that allowed him to avoid controversial issues by saying that he had to maintain neutrality with relation to the legislative agenda.
However, as a legislator-at-large, he has a completely different role to fill, which means that he can no longer sit around all day saying nothing.
In the current legislative session, transitional justice and the return of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) ill-gotten assets are two hotly-debated issues.
Some KMT members have been finding all kinds of excuses to oppose legislation regulating the return of party assets, but Wang has maintained his aloof attitude and avoided involvement in the fray.
Wang has three choices: He can pretend to be deaf and dumb and say nothing; he can act against his conscience and chime in with the other KMT thugs and say that the party assets issue has already been dealt with, while making nonsensical comparisons with some organization that does not belong to the KMT to “prove” that the pan-green camp is no better than the pan-blue camp; or he could be fair and just and demand that the KMT return its assets to the public.
Wang does not dare side with the public and call for the return of the party assets, nor is he willing to act against his conscience and help the KMT keep its assets. He is even more afraid of blaming the KMT, because that might result in his expulsion from the party and even end his position as a legislator-at-large. He has therefore chosen to neither speak up for what is right nor to testify falsely on account of the party and its assets.
He could of course say that those who criticize him for not standing on the side of the public are trying to hurt the relationship between him and the public, that those who say that he is afraid to take the side of the public and demand the return of the party assets are sowing discord between him and the party, or that those criticizing him for doing nothing in the legislature are trying to destroy his relationship with the other legislators.
However, using fact to separate truth from falsehood and evaluating the performance of public personalities is precisely the kind of “discord sowing” that is the responsibility of the media.
Wang does not dare to represent public opinion, nor is he thick-skinned enough to represent the opinion of his corruption-laden party. As this old man spends his days in the legislature, seeing the energy of the young generation as they are working hard to bring about reform, he should be ashamed of himself.
Does he still understand the meaning of the word “justice?”
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past