Despite the pro-China Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) defeat in January’s presidential election, Beijing is still hopeful that president-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) will pledge the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) allegiance to the “one China” principle when she is inaugurated as president on May 20.
During a session of China’s National People’s Congress on March 5, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (李克強) reiterated the necessity of the so-called “1992 consensus” for positive cross-strait interactions based on “common political underpinning.”
On the heels of Xi and Li’s comments, Beijing-based All-China Federation of Taiwan Compatriots president and National People’s Congress member Wang Yifu (汪毅夫) called on the DPP to suspend its “Taiwanese independence” party platform.
However, none of these calls, which are expected from the Chinese, are more awkward or disconcerting than a recent warning from former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起), who admitted in 2000 that he had made up the term “1992 consensus.”
In an article published by the Chinese-language United Evening News on Monday last week, Su was quoted as saying that during a visit to Shanghai last month, he and Taipei Forum members were told to read an online article which was circulating among various Chinese departments that deal with Taiwan affairs. The article said that as peaceful cross-strait unification is no longer possible, China could start preparing itself for a war to conquer Taiwan by force, to be launched some time between January and May next year.
The article, penned by a self-declared Chinese sociologist living in the US, said that if the Taiwan “problem” does not get solved now, it would deteriorate and be procrastinated over forever.
“Since the chance that Tsai would openly endorse the ‘1992 consensus’ and that Taiwan and [China] belong to the same China is extremely slim, it is time for Beijing to prepare for war,” the man was quoted by the paper as saying.
Setting aside doubts over the veracity of members of the Chinese political establishment reading an article by a hawkish Chinese with no academic position in the US or China, Su, as an academic long-immersed in cross-strait affairs, should know better than to fall for such a scheme and be turned into a mouthpiece for the Chinese government.
It is even more regrettable that his assistance in conveying such a message has been assisted by the deep-blue camp, including the KMT’s clownish figure Chiu Yi (邱毅), who made a live call to the article’s author during a political television show on Monday.
The author responded by saying that Taiwanese should not blame China for waging a war and that “Taiwan’s independence-leaning party” is to blame.
The host claimed that the author’s comments “have made Taiwanese more familiar with what [the Chinese] public are thinking.”
Since January’s elections, Taiwanese have seen some intimidating sticks which embody the Chinese menace being wielded their way, including the call for a tighter “loyalty check” over Taiwanese businesspeople in China and the move to reduce the number of Chinese visitors to Taiwan. However, there have been no signs of any carrots.
Considering how Chinese domestic politics have played out recently, with Xi tightening his control and factional infighting rampant in the Chinese Communist Party, showcasing a resolute stance toward Taiwan is necessary for China’s leaders.
However, breaking the delicate cross-strait balance now is probably the last thing they want.
The DPP is going to have a difficult time maintaining its promise to Taiwanese and presenting a cross-strait position that is acceptable to Beijing. However, parroting a warmonger’s nonsense is the last thing the nation needs.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath