Transitional justice has become a popular catchphrase lately with politicians from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), who are poised to take executive power on May 20, in addition to already winning a majority in the legislature in January, and racing to pitch legislation and ideas aimed at achieving transitional justice.
Aside from attention on a higher political level, such as a proposal to remove portraits of Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) from public buildings and draft legislation on resolving the issue of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) ill-gotten party assets, the incoming DPP administration should be reminded that transitional justice is also lacking on school campuses.
A recent incident at National Chengchi University exposed just how little transitional justice has been achieved in the nation from the bottom up.
The absurdity of military personnel on senior-high school and university campuses was highlighted in an incident in which fliers put up by students listing the names of people killed in the 228 Incident were torn from campus bulletin boards by the university’s chief military instructor on the grounds that the students were “stirring up trouble.”
While those unfamiliar with Taiwan’s educational system might be flabbergasted by the idea of military personnel on school campuses, the practice is not foreign to students in Taiwan. The so-called military instructors have been posted at senior-high school and university campuses since 1951. During the Martial Law era, military instructors were charged with preventing student demonstrations or riots on campuses.
While military instructors, along with the nation’s democratization, have over the past decade transformed their missions to providing counseling services and helping maintain school discipline, their continued on-campus presence nonetheless remains a symbol of authoritarianism.
In one incident in October 2004, a military instructor named Sung Wen (宋文), while under investigation for bribery, was found to have a bank account, which was established before the DPP became the ruling party in 2000, associated with the National Security Council to fund the tracking of political activities on school campuses and the political beliefs of educators.
There have been various reports of conflicts between military instructors and students, and the latest incident between the two groups at National Chengchi University merely served to highlight the instructors’ awkward presence on school campuses.
Educational institutions have their own academic staff, counselors and security guards. There is no need for military personnel to have a presence on campus, let alone meddle with students’ on-campus activities. After all, how can the nation’s educators be expected to teach younger generations about the true values of democracy and transitional justice when remnants of the authoritarian era stroll about on almost every school and college campus?
The existence of military instructors on school campuses is an abnormal product of the nation’s authoritarian past, and it is time for them to be removed.
Taiwan’s democracy is often touted as a success story, and it is indeed a major asset to the nation that all Taiwanese should be proud of. However, until the ridiculous, ubiquitous presence of military instructors on school and university campuses is put to an end, the nation is but a fragile democracy where the stain of authoritarian practices remains.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
RSS