Transitional justice has become a popular catchphrase lately with politicians from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), who are poised to take executive power on May 20, in addition to already winning a majority in the legislature in January, and racing to pitch legislation and ideas aimed at achieving transitional justice.
Aside from attention on a higher political level, such as a proposal to remove portraits of Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) from public buildings and draft legislation on resolving the issue of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) ill-gotten party assets, the incoming DPP administration should be reminded that transitional justice is also lacking on school campuses.
A recent incident at National Chengchi University exposed just how little transitional justice has been achieved in the nation from the bottom up.
The absurdity of military personnel on senior-high school and university campuses was highlighted in an incident in which fliers put up by students listing the names of people killed in the 228 Incident were torn from campus bulletin boards by the university’s chief military instructor on the grounds that the students were “stirring up trouble.”
While those unfamiliar with Taiwan’s educational system might be flabbergasted by the idea of military personnel on school campuses, the practice is not foreign to students in Taiwan. The so-called military instructors have been posted at senior-high school and university campuses since 1951. During the Martial Law era, military instructors were charged with preventing student demonstrations or riots on campuses.
While military instructors, along with the nation’s democratization, have over the past decade transformed their missions to providing counseling services and helping maintain school discipline, their continued on-campus presence nonetheless remains a symbol of authoritarianism.
In one incident in October 2004, a military instructor named Sung Wen (宋文), while under investigation for bribery, was found to have a bank account, which was established before the DPP became the ruling party in 2000, associated with the National Security Council to fund the tracking of political activities on school campuses and the political beliefs of educators.
There have been various reports of conflicts between military instructors and students, and the latest incident between the two groups at National Chengchi University merely served to highlight the instructors’ awkward presence on school campuses.
Educational institutions have their own academic staff, counselors and security guards. There is no need for military personnel to have a presence on campus, let alone meddle with students’ on-campus activities. After all, how can the nation’s educators be expected to teach younger generations about the true values of democracy and transitional justice when remnants of the authoritarian era stroll about on almost every school and college campus?
The existence of military instructors on school campuses is an abnormal product of the nation’s authoritarian past, and it is time for them to be removed.
Taiwan’s democracy is often touted as a success story, and it is indeed a major asset to the nation that all Taiwanese should be proud of. However, until the ridiculous, ubiquitous presence of military instructors on school and university campuses is put to an end, the nation is but a fragile democracy where the stain of authoritarian practices remains.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS