Transitional justice has become a popular catchphrase lately with politicians from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), who are poised to take executive power on May 20, in addition to already winning a majority in the legislature in January, and racing to pitch legislation and ideas aimed at achieving transitional justice.
Aside from attention on a higher political level, such as a proposal to remove portraits of Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) from public buildings and draft legislation on resolving the issue of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) ill-gotten party assets, the incoming DPP administration should be reminded that transitional justice is also lacking on school campuses.
A recent incident at National Chengchi University exposed just how little transitional justice has been achieved in the nation from the bottom up.
The absurdity of military personnel on senior-high school and university campuses was highlighted in an incident in which fliers put up by students listing the names of people killed in the 228 Incident were torn from campus bulletin boards by the university’s chief military instructor on the grounds that the students were “stirring up trouble.”
While those unfamiliar with Taiwan’s educational system might be flabbergasted by the idea of military personnel on school campuses, the practice is not foreign to students in Taiwan. The so-called military instructors have been posted at senior-high school and university campuses since 1951. During the Martial Law era, military instructors were charged with preventing student demonstrations or riots on campuses.
While military instructors, along with the nation’s democratization, have over the past decade transformed their missions to providing counseling services and helping maintain school discipline, their continued on-campus presence nonetheless remains a symbol of authoritarianism.
In one incident in October 2004, a military instructor named Sung Wen (宋文), while under investigation for bribery, was found to have a bank account, which was established before the DPP became the ruling party in 2000, associated with the National Security Council to fund the tracking of political activities on school campuses and the political beliefs of educators.
There have been various reports of conflicts between military instructors and students, and the latest incident between the two groups at National Chengchi University merely served to highlight the instructors’ awkward presence on school campuses.
Educational institutions have their own academic staff, counselors and security guards. There is no need for military personnel to have a presence on campus, let alone meddle with students’ on-campus activities. After all, how can the nation’s educators be expected to teach younger generations about the true values of democracy and transitional justice when remnants of the authoritarian era stroll about on almost every school and college campus?
The existence of military instructors on school campuses is an abnormal product of the nation’s authoritarian past, and it is time for them to be removed.
Taiwan’s democracy is often touted as a success story, and it is indeed a major asset to the nation that all Taiwanese should be proud of. However, until the ridiculous, ubiquitous presence of military instructors on school and university campuses is put to an end, the nation is but a fragile democracy where the stain of authoritarian practices remains.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS