A new reality is emerging in Asia. In recent decades, many of Asia’s economies have boomed. The region today accounts for about 40 percent of the world’s GDP — up from 25 percent in 1990 — and contributes about two-thirds of global economic growth.
There is more. Asia has made unprecedented strides in reducing poverty and improving broad development indicators. The poverty rate fell from 55 percent in 1990 to 21 percent in 2010, while education and health outcomes have improved significantly.
Hundreds of millions of lives have been improved in the process. And, looking ahead, Asia is expected to continue to grow at an average annual rate of 5 percent, leading global economic expansion.
However, today the region is facing challenging new economic conditions. With growth in advanced economies tepid, risk aversion increasing in global financial markets and the commodity super-cycle coming to an end, the world economy is providing little impetus to Asian growth.
At the same time, China is moving toward a more sustainable growth model that implies slower expansion. Given the growing links between China and the rest of the world, particularly Asia, the spillover effects are significant. Indeed, China is now the top trading partner of most major regional economies, particularly in East Asia and ASEAN.
New research by the IMF, to be published in next month’s Regional Economic Outlook for Asia and the Pacific, suggests that the median Asian country’s economic sensitivity to China’s GDP has doubled in the last couple of decades. So China’s slowdown means a slower pace of growth across Asia.
Asia’s achievements in recent decades attest to the hard work of the region’s people, as well as to the soundness of the policies that many Asian governments have adopted since the late 1990s, including improved monetary policy and exchange rate frameworks, increased international reserve buffers and stronger financial sector regulation and supervision. Against this backdrop, the region attracted vast amounts of foreign direct investment.
As trade links expanded, a sophisticated network of integrated supply chains emerged, creating the conditions for Asia to become a manufacturing powerhouse and, increasingly, an exporter of services as well.
More recently, thanks to strong policies and ample reserves, the region quickly recovered from the global financial crisis. Asia also benefited during these years from strong global tailwinds, including favorable external financing conditions and the rapid expansion of the Chinese economy.
Amid this new testing reality now dawning in Asia, we must not lose sight of the deep and long-term structural challenges facing the region. Populations are rapidly aging and even declining in countries like Japan, South Korea, Singapore and Thailand, dragging down potential growth and putting pressure on fiscal balances.
Income inequality is a further challenge. While inequality has remained stable or declined in Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines, it is rising in many parts of the region, most notably in India and China (as well as other parts of East Asia).
In many emerging markets and developing countries, widespread infrastructure gaps persist, notably in power and transport. And, elsewhere in the region — the small Pacific islands in particular — vulnerability to the effects of climate change is increasing.
This shifting landscape calls for bold action on several fronts. While the response would certainly need to be tailored to each country’s specific circumstances, some recommendations could be helpful for most countries:
As inflation remains low across most of the region, monetary policy should remain supportive of growth in case downside risks materialize.
Exchange rate flexibility and targeted macroprudential policies should be part of the risk management toolkit.
Countries need to deepen their financial systems to channel the large pool of domestic and regional savings toward financing their development needs. For example, closing the region’s infrastructure gaps remains critical.
Structural reforms, aided by fiscal policy, should support the economic transitions and rebalancing, while boosting potential growth and alleviating poverty.
The good news is that Asia, as demonstrated by its strong performance in recent years, can meet these challenges and continue to build upon the significant achievements of the past two decades. It has the resources and the people; it has the buffers and resilience; and it has ample opportunities for further trade and financial integration.
To discuss these challenges, India and the IMF are organizing the Advancing Asia conference in New Delhi from Friday through today, bringing together regional policymakers and thinkers.
India, a bright spot among emerging markets in these difficult times — indeed, the world’s fastest-growing major economy — is an auspicious place to hold this gathering.
Our mutual aim in convening with Asian policymakers is clear and critical, for Asia and for the global economy: To ensure that growth in Asia continues to be robust, sustainable and inclusive so that the region remains a powerful locomotive for global growth.
Changyong Rhee is director of the IMF’s Asia and Pacific department.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers