During his trip to Japan last month, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) said that Taiwan’s cities are light-years behind Japan’s in terms of urban aesthetics. However, in the same week his administration sparked controversies over an “ugly” lantern and for approving the reconstruction of a building connected with the 228 Incident.
Ko seemed to have a strong appreciation of what makes a city beautiful when he praised the renovation of the 100-year-old Tokyo Station as “having reached a balance between the preservation of a historic building and modernization” and described the station’s shops and restaurants as being “prettier” than Taipei’s.
“That is what is known as urban aesthetics — something wanting in Taipei,” he said.
However, just the day before, Ko called a wooden present given to him by an art center “a toy for those who are extremely bored” and said he did not go to Japan for art, but for an exchange on municipal affairs.
The Taipei mayor is obviously naive, if not silly, regarding what “aesthetics” is.
The mayor uttering the term is all the more ironic considering that in the same week of his visit to Japan, a “monkey-gourd” lantern was unveiled — to be featured in the Taipei Lantern Festival — that many have described as “ugly.”
Ko once referred to people who strive for the preservation of Taipei’s historic sites and buildings as “cultural terrorists,” while failing to live up to his promises — made before the municipal election in 2014 — to preserve the Nangang Bottle Cap Factory and keep Jiahe New Village intact.
He dismissed calls to rebuild Zhongshan Bridge — originally called Meiji Bridge when it was completed in 1930 — which was torn down in 2003 for reconstruction.
Ko also proposed relocating the century-old Mitsui Warehouse — a move strongly opposed by cultural groups and academics.
Ko’s most recent brouhaha concerns a building that saw the onset of the 228 Incident in 1947. Now belonging to Changhwa Bank, the building served as the Monopoly Bureau’s Taipei branch during the Japanese colonial era and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime after it took over the island in 1945.
The building featured in a famous photo, taken by a New York Times reporter, which shows a large crowd gathered outside the building on Feb. 28, 1947, after a bureau inspector beat a woman selling unauthorized cigarettes and killed an onlooker by accident the day before — which later came to be recognized as the trigger of an explosion of deep resentment against a corrupt regime.
The city government recently approved Changhwa Bank’s proposal to “revitalize its asset” and “reconstruct” the three-story building into a 13-story one and only asked the bank to preserve the “facade and the arcade.”
Experts and culture aficionados said the plan is tantamount to the obliteration of a historic landmark.
It has been four years since the building was first designated a historic landmark and not even a plaque has been placed to mark it. What historical significance can people expect to be treasured by the government and the company in the “facade and arcade” after its “reconstruction?”
“Aesthetic” historic sites cannot exist in a vacuum; they need human appreciation and maintenance.
The only “monument” that Ko has said he is against tearing down is the Chang Kai-shek Memorial Hall, a move he has said is in need of further debate.
We hope that he can be more open to public opinion when it comes to other buildings of historical significance as well.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past