Even before the election results on Saturday last week, there were rumors that China might reduce the number of tourists allowed to visit Taiwan if Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) was elected. While this might worry some people, it could be a good opportunity to readjust the nation’s tourism promotion policy.
After more than half a century of hostility, the governments of Taiwan and China finally agreed to lift a ban on Chinese tourism to Taiwan in June 2008. The number of Chinese visitors skyrocketed and last year Chinese tourists accounted for more than 40 percent of all foreign visitors.
With millions of Chinese tourists visiting Taiwan annually, the tourism industry should be able to reap the benefits, yet the “one-dragon” (一條龍) service — meaning that Chinese companies organize the transportation, shopping, meals, accommodation and other services catering to Chinese tour groups — excludes non-Chinese businesses from the market.
Taiwanese tour guides and travel agencies have repeatedly said that due to the low prices that Chinese tourists pay to join tour groups to Taiwan, they make very little profit, as some Chinese travel agencies pay Taiwanese tour companies only US$40 or less per person per day to provide activities and accommodation, despite Tourism Bureau regulations that set the minimum per person per day budget at US$80.
Taiwanese tour guides have tried to make more money by charging souvenir shops commissions and as a result, souvenir items in some stores might be sold at higher prices to Chinese tourists.
A tea grower told the Taipei Times in an interview that a travel agency asked if the store would be willing to receive Chinese tour groups under the condition that the store pay 70 percent of profits made in sales to the Chinese tourists in commission to the agency.
The overwhelming number of Chinese tourists also affects the quality of vacations in Taiwan for both locals and travelers from other nations.
People complain that popular tourist destinations are overcrowded with Chinese tourists: At Alishan (阿里山), it is nearly impossible to get tickets for the famous mountain railroad, as tickets for entire trains are often booked by Chinese travel agencies. At Sun Moon Lake (日月潭) in Nantou County, people are irritated by Chinese tourists cutting in line to take pictures at scenic spots. At the National Palace Museum in Taipei, people often complain that Chinese tourists are speaking too loudly, disrupting their appreciation of the collections. Museum staff recommend that domestic visitors come from 6pm to 9pm on Friday and Saturday nights, as Taiwanese get free entry into the museum, and few Chinese tourists visit at that time.
The decline in quality of travel has also led to a decline in the numbers of tourists from other nations.
Many Chinese tourists say Taiwan is a place of low quality, and there is a popular saying in China that “if you have been to Taiwan, you will regret it for the rest of your life.”
Most importantly, the Chinese government can arbitrarily control the number of Chinese nationals to Taiwan. An over-reliance on Chinese tourists means the survival of Taiwan’s tourism industry is in Beijing’s hands.
If Beijing cut down on the number of Chinese tourists allowed to visit Taiwan, the tourism industry might suffer for a short while, yet, in the long run, it is a good opportunity for Taiwan to readjust its tourism policy for healthier development.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS