Oil money no longer pays the bills in Alaska.
Alaskan Governor Bill Walker, facing a profound fiscal crisis, has proposed the imposition of a personal income tax for the first time in 35 years. State lawmakers, who recently moved into a palatial new office building, where they work when not toiling in the far-off Alaska State Capitol in Juneau, are now seeking less costly digs.
And a state budget that was a point of Alaskan pride — and envy from around the US — lies in tatters as revenue that flowed from selling crude oil from Prudhoe Bay over the past four decades has been swept away.
With oil prices down along with oil production, the state is facing an Alaska-size shortfall: Two-thirds of the revenue needed to cover this year’s US$5.2 billion state budget cannot be collected.
Many Alaskans are not old enough to recall times this bad. This is the nation’s least-taxed state, where oil royalties and energy taxes once paid for 90 percent of state functions. Oil money was so plentiful that residents received annual dividend checks from a state savings fund that could total more than US$8,000 for a family of four — arriving each autumn, as predictable as the first snowfall.
Walker, an independent, is proposing to scale back those dividends as he seeks to get Alaska back on a stable financial footing with less dependence on oil.
“It will move us back to where we were before,” he said in an interview. “We can do it.”
Every resource dependent corner of the globe is in stress these days as commodity prices from copper to soybeans have collapsed to multiyear lows. States like Texas and Louisiana are also grappling with the oil downturn, but Alaska’s situation is unique.
The nearly 1,300km Trans-Alaska Pipeline, which was approved by the US Congress in the depths of the mid-1970s energy crisis and was completed in a crash course construction cycle only a few years later, allowed crude oil to be shipped from oil fields emerging in the Arctic to the port in Valdez. With every barrel of oil, the state collected a royalty and a production tax that paid for most of the state government and the creation of a multibillion-dollar Permanent Fund savings account.
The fund has paid dividends to residents every year since 1982, from US$300 to US$500 a person in the early years to more than US$2,000 this year, based on the fund’s investments.
Walker’s recovery plan would take more from residents through the income tax and would give them less as well, by changing the formula under which the dividend is paid. The income tax would be 6 percent of the amount an Alaskan currently pays in federal taxes, so a person who owed US$10,000 to the Internal Revenue Service would also need to write a US$600 check to Alaska.
Dividend payments would be tied directly to royalties that decrease or increase with oil production. Because oil production is down, next year’s payout would be cut by roughly half under the proposal, to about US$1,000 a person. Walker would also raise taxes on alcohol and tobacco and would collect new taxes from the fishing, mining, energy and tourism industries.
With so much pain to spread around, Walker, a former Republican, will clearly have a fight on his hands in the Republican-controlled state legislature. He was elected last year on a “unity ticket” with a Democrat as his lieutenant governor, defeating the Republican incumbent, Sean Parnell — a perceived betrayal for which many Republicans have not forgiven Walker.
However, he also has some powerful allies.
“We’ve had it awfully good for a long time, and if we want to protect that, we’re going to have to make some hard choices,” said Ronald Duncan, the president and chief executive of GCI, a telecommunications company that is one of the state’s largest non-oil businesses.
Duncan is organizing a group to push for hard choices with a statewide publicity campaign that is set to start next month. The campaign, aimed at residents as well as the legislature, is still being shaped, Duncan said. His enthusiasm for the governor’s message in recent weeks — that residents will have to be less reliant on oil companies and pick up more of the burden themselves, as they did in the past — was clear. Duncan said he thinks a broader economic recession is inevitable next year if Alaska’s budget is not stabilized.
“I’m a fan of what the governor has done here,” he said. “The fact that he has relatively good approval ratings in the general population is helpful in that regard. The place in the state where the governor has absolutely horrendous approval ratings is in the legislature.”
Republican leaders said the governor’s plans would be given fair consideration. The speaker of the House, Mike Chenault, has conceded that some new revenue stream is probably unavoidable. In a deep first wave of budget cuts this year, Alaska eliminated almost all capital spending. But that was easy, Chenault said, compared with the road ahead.
“We can’t cut our way out of this,” Chenault, a gravel-voiced construction company executive, told a business group at a recent breakfast meeting.
The president of the state senate, Kevin Meyer, a Republican who is also an employee of the oil giant ConocoPhillips, said that he thought deeper budget cuts were still necessary and that residents would accept new taxes only when they were convinced that the old pattern of state spending — wasteful and inefficient, in his view — had been wrung out of the system.
With little power, Democrats have supported the idea of raising some new taxes, but argue that the governor’s plan would disproportionally hit working-class Alaskans.
Which sectors of the state are hurt, or spared, will also be on the table when the legislature returns to Juneau next month. Walker’s income tax plan, for example, would primarily hit urban Alaska, where most jobs are. A sales tax, by contrast, which some lawmakers favor, would hurt rural areas more because prices for most items are already higher in remote areas.
The energy industry’s main lobbying group has vowed to fight Walker’s proposal to collect US$100 million in new taxes on oil and gas companies, while reducing by US$400 million the tax credits they can claim. However, at a recent town hall event in Anchorage on the budget crisis, it was clear that the energy industry has some image problems.
“Alaska was a great state before oil came to town,” Evan Beedle, 54, an unemployed former school bus driver and technician, told state officials at the meeting. “I remember when neighbors were neighbors and doors were unlocked — now it’s just a skirmish for the dollar. I realize now that we have become dependent on oil.”
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US