Prosperity and birth rates
I write first to commend my fellow University of Minnesota economics classmate Perng Fai-nan (彭淮南) for his governance of the central bank these past years, and especially for the bank’s recent decision to go against the rising tide at the US Federal Reserve Bank (and others, including Hong Kong) of raising interest rates in the face of continuing economic stagnation.
Taiwan fared relatively well during the financial crisis of 2008 and thereafter — much better than the US or Europe — and much of the credit belongs to the management of the central bank. Lowering its interbank rates at this time is the right decision.
Second, I want to respond to the editorial about what the Taipei Times called a “disconcertingly low birth rate” (Editorial, Dec. 18, page 8).
Taiwan’s low-birth rate might harm certain businesses and real-estate interests by putting upward pressure on wages and less pressure on housing costs.
However, for society as a whole, these changes are among the many benefits that derive from a lower birth rate. Yes, it will also cost more to recruit soldiers for the nation’s defense needs, but this is also a matter of justice for Taiwanese, especially for those in the armed forces.
Supporters of increased birth rates argue from covert self-interest. National security is often raised in political arguments when other reasons fail: It should be regarded as suspect when raised regarding birth rates. The national security arguments fail for many reasons, but there is not space here for details.
Consider just two things: First, cases in recent history where coalitions with much larger populations have not been able to prevail against less populous places such as in Vietnam, Afghanistan or Israel; and second, there is no possibility of competing with China on population.
This leaves the foremost argument that is proposed for our concern: That low birth rates mean aging populations. Who, it is asked, is going to support us in old age if there are fewer workers? On the face of it, this argument seems sensible, but it does not fare well under scrutiny.
The world has limited resources. Seven or more billion people cannot all have the material lives we each aspire to. A lower birth rate leaves more resources per person, higher wages and more prosperity.
Technical progress will continue to make some work redundant, and most work less taxing and more productive. The market for labor will change and adapt as conditions change.
Growing populations re the real problem, not aging populations. To maintain prosperity, Taiwan, as with the rest of the world, must limit population growth.
As for national security, prosperity is strength.
Robert Dildine
Yilan County
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers