Fifteen-year-old Wu Yiling (吳亦玲) celebrated when she heard that her school was canceling classes for three days because of air pollution.
Finally, she would be able to stay up late watching her favorite South Korean soap operas and play computer games with friends, she thought.
However, at the crack of dawn on Wednesday last week, Yiling’s mother jolted her out of bed.
Illustration: Mountain People
Her literature teacher had assigned 100 pages of reading, including an intricate Song Dynasty poem. Her mother had arranged a tutoring session with a math instructor. An English teacher had announced that there would be a six-part exam on Friday.
“I quickly learned that there’s no such thing as a day off,” said Yiling, who attends a high school in eastern Beijing. “Even when we can barely breathe outside, somehow we are supposed to do our schoolwork.”
As smog blanketed the city for a second day on Wednesday last week, reviving calls for officials to take action, millions of families grappled with the unexpected closing of schools across the city.
Parents searched frantically for day-care options. Teachers drew up impromptu lesson plans for use at home. Students who dreamed of leisurely breaks and trips to the mall braced for hours of drills and review sessions instead.
“It’s hard to be at home and doing nonstop work,” said Zhang Wei (張偉), 14, a middle-school student in central Beijing. “I wish the skies were clear and we could play outside.”
In online forums, students bemoaned the amount of work they had to complete over the three-day break.
“You may never know how badly we will be tortured by the teachers in the three days that we are home,” an unidentified student wrote in a widely circulated post on a Chinese microblogging site. “Kids in Beijing, go cry.”
Several parents and students said they were concerned that school closings would become more frequent as the severe air pollution persisted.
While Beijing has historically kept its schools open, no matter how poisonous the air is, the government last week issued a “red alert” for the first time, advising schools to close down from Tuesday through Thursday.
Factories were also shut and half of all cars were kept off the roads. However, in other cities across northern China, tens of millions of people, including schoolchildren, went about their daily routines in toxic air that was far worse than Beijing’s.
“Smog will be the norm in the future, so what are you going to do about it?” said Zhang Lili (張麗麗), 38, a university instructor in Beijing and the mother of an eight-year-old son. “Are we supposed to suspend classes whenever there is smog? Am I supposed to become a stay-at-home mother?”
As smog levels reached hazardous levels on Wednesday last week, parents hoarded face masks and bought air purifiers.
Some said it was unsustainable to have students studying at home and questioned whether it was an effective safety precaution.
“Schools and homes share the same air pollution problem,” said Chen Xiao (陳曉), 35, a translator who is the father of a nine-year-old boy. “My son can still be hurt by smog.”
The pollution had gotten so bad recently that his family was considering leaving Beijing, Chen said.
Chinese parents invest extraordinary amounts of time and money to ensure that their children succeed academically and many said they worried their children might fall behind if they were kept out of school too long.
School closings in Beijing are rare, given the city’s dry climate and lack of snow.
An exception was the outbreak of SARS in 2003, when the city suspended classes for several weeks.
The red alert led residents to take more precautions, but the lack of official responses in cities like Anyang, Henan Province, and Handan, Hebei Province — both with hazardous levels of smog — pointed to a major shortcoming of efforts by Chinese officials to battle air pollution and protect people from its effects.
However, some experts said that Beijing’s red alert was a watershed moment, and that other provinces could feel pressure to impose stricter measures — if only to lessen some of the pollutants from their factories blowing to Beijing, a showcase metropolis and home to more than 20 million people — including the Chinese Communist Party leadership.
“There will be pressure on them, but whether they will do it or not is a question,” Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy energy and climate academic Wang Tao (王濤) said of provincial and local officials.
When issuing the red alert, Beijing authorities told parents that while classes were suspended, students should continue studying.
They encouraged parents to use the time to teach their children “life and safety” lessons.
The government also unveiled a database of 5,000 lecture videos, covering topics like Chinese history and biology, on a state-run digital education platform.
Private tutoring companies, a booming industry in China, seized on the disruption caused by the smog to make a pitch for their products. Some offered extra tutoring sessions to help prepare for college exams. Others advertised online courses, saying that parents could return to work with peace of mind while their children studied at home.
At Beijing Jingshan School, a prestigious public school, teachers led online classes for students in subjects like math and Chinese. One class on Wednesday last week focused on the history of air pollution in China, making the argument that it was present even in ancient times, when fog and dust storms were common in Beijing.
At some of the city’s most competitive schools, parents were asked to provide pictures of their children completing school assignments as proof that they were still studying.
They happily complied, flooding online forums with snapshots of their children seated at desks and next to calculators.
He Mei (何梅), 40, a housewife in Beijing, said her daughter, He Xiang (何湘), 8, could have a healthier lifestyle by studying at home, taking more breaks and eating more fruit.
“Beijing is dirty and dry,” He said. “Staying at home is good for her health.”
Her daughter disagreed.
“I don’t like the smog,” she said. “I want to go outside and play with my classmates.”
When Ma Chenlei (馬晨蕾), 44, an engineer, and Wang Yanhui (王岩輝), 46, a salesman, first heard that the pollution in Beijing would reach hazardous levels this week, they decided to stay home with their two children until classes resumed. They have alternated study time with play breaks and occasional walks around the block, to make up for missed exercise classes.
“I don’t like it; I cough a lot,” said their seven-year-old daughter, Yifan (王易凡). “When I wear a mask, I feel a little suffocated.”
Inside the family’s apartment, Yifan showed off her completed math and English homework, which she had sent to her teachers, while her three-year-old brother, Yichen (王易辰), played with race cars.
Her daughter’s school was planning to install air filters next year, Ma said, adding that in the meantime, there was nothing they could do to alleviate the pollution.
“We hope that every day the air is clean,” she said. “But it will take much longer than one or two days to solve this problem.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers