The issue of whether Chinese students in Taiwan should be included in the National Health Insurance (NHI) program is like a political barometer for measuring the state of Taiwanese society, and it can serve as an indicator of the nation’s development as a society.
Addressing the issue three years ago, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that the focus should be on reciprocity, which was a tactful way of opposing NHI coverage for Chinese students. The medical systems on the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are at different levels of development; China does not have the same kind of health insurance program that Taiwan does. Stressing reciprocity when China does not have a corresponding system is a roundabout way of rejecting the idea.
With the legislature reviewing related legislation on Dec. 5, Tsai said that the DPP was not opposed to NHI coverage for Chinese students. She also said that based on human rights concerns and what society could accept, the party wanted to find a comprehensive solution that would provide the most effective and fair distribution of health insurance resources and government finances. It seems that the answer to the question of to what degree Chinese students should be included in the NHI program is either Tsai’s Achilles heel or a matter of political language.
The issue of NHI coverage has become a convenient vehicle for nationalism. It is a magic “monster-revealing mirror” to parties and politicians that used to uphold fairness, justice, the welfare state and human rights. Voters who have been lured by slogans and passionate appeals and are under the illusion that political parties and politicians are on the side of the disadvantaged can now have quite a laugh at themselves while ridiculing those degenerate parties that rely on Chinese or Taiwanese nationalism.
From a logical perspective, Chinese students are also foreign students, so it is rather odd to include foreign students while excluding Chinese students in the program. Taiwan should have the same standard for all foreign students within its jurisdiction. This is a quite simple principle, and any violation to fairness and consistency is likely to further complicate the issue.
Taiwanese hospitals and doctors generally follow the civilized rules of medical practice, and they would not allow any religious, national, racial, political or status factor to intervene with the doctor-patient relationship.
From a pragmatic perspective, foreign students are young people, and data show that they are actually the group consuming the least medical resources. Furthermore, foreign students who pay tuition and spend their money here are creating job opportunities and economic development, while at the same time promoting cross-cultural understanding. To be a bit blunt, Chinese students are not only a target for top foreign universities, they are also an asset that Taiwan wants. Advanced educational systems around the world are striving to attract international students. Taiwan should be careful not to make a fool of itself by pushing the NHI issue to the point of discriminating against a small minority.
The NHI program is part of Taiwan’s basic infrastructure. During Tsai’s school years in the UK in the early 1980s, the British government protected her right to free healthcare, even though Taiwan did not have a national health insurance program at the time. Yet, she still proposed reciprocity and equality between Taiwan and China as if she had never studied in the UK. At least 20,000 Taiwanese students in the UK are covered by its health program, and not one of them has to pay taxes there.
Just like the NHI program in Taiwan, the British program is suffering financial difficulties, and young doctors are planning a strike due to their long work hours. Despite the British government’s past generous policy toward foreign students, they now have to pay a small fee, but Britons have never vented their anger over past battles by discriminating against foreign students from Germany, Argentina, Serbia, Afghanistan or Syria, because pragmatism is in the UK’s best interest.
The issue of NHI coverage for Chinese students is not a matter of whether you are a citizen or resident, nor is it an issue of whether you are a taxpayer or not, or a generous gift. What should really worry us is the erosion of the values that lie at the core of the NHI and medical care that could result from discrimination against Chinese students.
Chiang Sheng is an attending physician at Mackay Memorial Hospital.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers