Taiwan’s bid to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) offers an opportunity to globalize its economy and move away from excessive reliance on China.
As with any agreement, the TPP would offer both benefits and drawbacks, and so it is both an opportunity and a challenge, which comes with a price. The price should be paid to the nation’s friends rather than an ungrateful enemy who only wants to annex it.
The only concern of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government is how to step down safely, so it is not expected to take action on the nation’s TPP bid, as this would run counter to Ma’s pro-China policy.
Minister of Economic Affairs John Deng (鄧振中) made an inappropriate remark not too long ago, saying that Taiwan would only be able to enter the TPP if China did not oppose it, because China is the largest market of half of the member states, which, according to him, are likely to have their own concerns regarding the matter.
Since China still has not taken an official stance on Taiwan’s TPP bid, why did Deng speak on Beijing’s behalf? China’s opposition to Taiwan’s bid is to be expected, because Beijing does not want the nation to escape from its economic cage. China wants to join the TPP so that it can change the rules from the inside or cause trouble as it did in the UN and the WTO.
However, the TPP’s strict rules demand that member states follow universal values, which means that it is almost impossible for China to enter the partnership. It would not be able to join as a developing nation and enjoy the accompanying benefits as it did with the WTO.
Although the regulations did not specifically target China when the US launched the TPP talks in 2005, they are now seen as China’s nemesis. Since China wants to join the TPP to promote its “One Belt, One Road” strategy, it is unlikely to criticize the partnership or block Taiwan’s bid. The nation should seize this opportunity to focus its efforts instead of belittling itself and asking for Beijing’s approval.
China is the largest trade partner of eight of the 12 TPP members: Australia, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam (the remaining members are Brunei, Canada, Mexico and the US).
Would these nations oppose Taiwan’s bid due to Chinese pressure? Are they Beijing’s friends? What would be their reasons for opposing Taiwan’s entry to the TPP? If they oppose Taiwan’s bid simply because China says so, would they not in effect become China’s vassal states?
Deng said that TPP members would have their own concerns. However, they probably think like Taiwan and want to reduce their economic dependence on China. Since Beijing often relies on political economy, using economic means to achieve political goals, these nations could join Taiwan in opposing China.
Also, during Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) visits to the US and Japan, both governments showed a positive attitude toward the nation’s bid to join the trade bloc.
Is the combination of the US’ and Japan’s economic influence inferior to China’s? Is Taiwan only pushing for a passive TPP membership, incapable of persuading all member states?
The Chinese Communist Party claims that the Republic of China (ROC) perished long ago.
If ROC officials must follow China’s whim in the performance of their duties, that is evidence of the seriousness of the Ma administration’s maladies.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers