Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) reputation was harmed by allegations made by Christina Liu (劉憶如), former head of the Council for Economic Planning and Development, over the Yu Chang Biologics Co [now known as TaiMed] case. The scandal, whipped up by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), caused irrevocable damage to the democratic value of fair elections as well as the nation’s biotechnology industry.
The Taipei District Court ruled that the allegations damaged Tsai’s reputation and ordered Liu to pay Tsai NT$2 million (US$61,630) in compensation, but the result of the 2012 presidential election, which Tsai lost, cannot be reversed. Hence, the public must always remember the KMT’s smear tactics, with which it won the election.
In democracies, political information is available to the public, which enables voters to elect the kind of people they want to see in public office.
When the KMT and President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration made false accusations against Yu Chang and Tsai by falsifying documents, they misled the voters. The KMT has gravely damaged the democratic value of fair elections.
Prior to the 2012 election, the KMT was focusing on the Yu Chang allegation.
By having Liu publish falsified documents and letting then-KMT whip Lin Yi-shih (林益世) hold press conferences, the KMT said that Tsai was seeking personal gain.
KMT legislators went so far as to demean Academia Sinica president Wong Chi-huey (翁啟惠) and world-renown AIDS researcher David Ho (何大一).
The KMT and its affiliates spent a considerable amount of money on advertising to discredit Yu Chang.
During the presidential debate, Ma attacked Tsai with questions about Yu Chang. Evidently, the KMT was willing to harm Taiwan’s biotechnology industry and fair elections to win the presidency.
Tsai held several press conferences, and made dozens of announcements and press releases to reveal the truth, while the KMT pulled out all the stops.
As a result, the public was confused and misguided by false information. After the Special Investigation Division (SID) took the initiative to investigate the case and confiscate official documents, the media reported on the “unusually fast pace of the National Development Fund’s approval of its Yu Chang investment.”
The government, KMT legislators and the SID were smearing Tsai. The KMT had enormous party assets to purchase advertising and the media were helping it to propagate its agenda.
Only a few months after Ma’s victory, former prosecutor-general Huang Shih-ming (黃世銘) and the SID would find that there was nothing illegal about the Yu Chang case.
The Taipei District Court has ruled against Liu. The SID found no illegal dealings took place about the case and long overdue justice has been served.
However, nothing can be undone for voters who believed the falsified documents, trusted the SID’s investigation, Ma and Lin.
The only thing people can do now is learn from the mistakes and prevent any false accusations from impinging on future elections.
Huang Di-ying is an attorney and DPP spokesperson.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers